Ulrich Weigand
2015-Mar-23 17:21 UTC
[LLVMdev] Removing TargetMachine CPU auto-detection for PowerPC and SystemZ?
Hi Hal, I only just noticed that about a year ago, Jim removed CPU auto-detection for the X86 target: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-April/071991.html http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140407/212676.html>Currently the X86 backend does CPU auto-detection and subtarget feature >detection when the TargetMachine is created if no explicit CPU was >specified. It's counterintuitive for low level tools like ‘llc’ to do >this, as it means the same .ll file compiled on heterogenous machines >generates different results from the same ‘llc’ command line. It is still >useful to be able to opt-in to such behavior to, for example, replicate >clang’s behavior when -mcpu=native is supplied to clang. My thought is >to do something similar here and teach ‘llc’ to recognize -mcpu=native >and probe the host CPU if that is given. The subtarget features will >then be filled in according to the feature string for that CPU. This >(a) changes the auto-detection from opt-out to opt-in and (b) moves >the logic out of the core target backend and into the tools drivers.>Attached are draft patches that do this for X86. Similar but smaller >cleanups can also be done for SystemZ and PowerPC if it’s agreed this >is a good idea.However, this was then never implemented for SystemZ and PowerPC. Should we do so as well? Note that mesa has in the meantime changed to do the auto-detection before setting up the JIT context, and I assume other JIT users have done so as well by now. For clang, this was never done automatically anyway. Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards Ulrich Weigand -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand | Phone: +49-7031/16-3727 STSM, GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz | Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen | Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
Hal Finkel
2015-Mar-23 18:42 UTC
[LLVMdev] Removing TargetMachine CPU auto-detection for PowerPC and SystemZ?
----- Original Message -----> From: "Ulrich Weigand" <Ulrich.Weigand at de.ibm.com> > To: "Hal J. Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu, grosbach at apple.com > Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 12:21:17 PM > Subject: Removing TargetMachine CPU auto-detection for PowerPC and SystemZ? > > > Hi Hal, > > I only just noticed that about a year ago, Jim removed CPU > auto-detection > for the X86 target: > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-April/071991.html > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140407/212676.html > > >Currently the X86 backend does CPU auto-detection and subtarget > >feature > >detection when the TargetMachine is created if no explicit CPU was > >specified. It's counterintuitive for low level tools like ‘llc’ to > >do > >this, as it means the same .ll file compiled on heterogenous > >machines > >generates different results from the same ‘llc’ command line. It is > >still > >useful to be able to opt-in to such behavior to, for example, > >replicate > >clang’s behavior when -mcpu=native is supplied to clang. My thought > >is > >to do something similar here and teach ‘llc’ to recognize > >-mcpu=native > >and probe the host CPU if that is given. The subtarget features will > >then be filled in according to the feature string for that CPU. This > >(a) changes the auto-detection from opt-out to opt-in and (b) moves > >the logic out of the core target backend and into the tools drivers. > > >Attached are draft patches that do this for X86. Similar but smaller > >cleanups can also be done for SystemZ and PowerPC if it’s agreed > >this > >is a good idea. > > However, this was then never implemented for SystemZ and PowerPC. > Should > we do so as well?Yes, I think we should. -Hal> > Note that mesa has in the meantime changed to do the auto-detection > before > setting up the JIT context, and I assume other JIT users have done so > as > well by now. For clang, this was never done automatically anyway. > > > Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards > > Ulrich Weigand > > -- > Dr. Ulrich Weigand | Phone: +49-7031/16-3727 > STSM, GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain > IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH > Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz | > Geschäftsführung: Dirk > Wittkopp > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen | Registergericht: Amtsgericht > Stuttgart, HRB 243294-- Hal Finkel Assistant Computational Scientist Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory
Ulrich Weigand
2015-Mar-30 18:41 UTC
[LLVMdev] Removing TargetMachine CPU auto-detection for PowerPC and SystemZ?
Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote on 23.03.2015 19:42:06:> > >Attached are draft patches that do this for X86. Similar but smaller > > >cleanups can also be done for SystemZ and PowerPC if it’s agreed > > >this is a good idea. > > > > However, this was then never implemented for SystemZ and PowerPC. > > Should we do so as well? > > Yes, I think we should.Checked in for SystemZ as r233540. Do you want me to do PowerPC too? Bye, Ulrich
Reasonably Related Threads
- [LLVMdev] Removing TargetMachine CPU auto-detection for PowerPC and SystemZ?
- [cfe-dev] Why is #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS not supported?
- [cfe-dev] Why is #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS not supported?
- [cfe-dev] Why is #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS not supported?
- [8.0.0 Release] rc4 has been tagged