hi, at the moment, TEST instruction is defined with 0xf7 opcode, as demonstrated below. $ echo "0xf7 0xc0 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x22"|./Release+Asserts/bin/llvm-mc -disassemble -arch=x86 .section __TEXT,__text,regular,pure_instructions testl $570425344, %eax ## imm = 0x22000000 however, i cannot find anywhere this F7 opcode is defined in lib/Target/X86/X86InstrArithmetic.td. we only have TEST defined with F6 & other opcode like below. any hint please? thanks. let isCompare = 1 in { let Defs = [EFLAGS] in { let isCommutable = 1 in { def TEST8rr : BinOpRR_F<0x84, "test", Xi8 , X86testpat, MRMSrcReg>; def TEST16rr : BinOpRR_F<0x84, "test", Xi16, X86testpat, MRMSrcReg>; def TEST32rr : BinOpRR_F<0x84, "test", Xi32, X86testpat, MRMSrcReg>; def TEST64rr : BinOpRR_F<0x84, "test", Xi64, X86testpat, MRMSrcReg>; } // isCommutable def TEST8rm : BinOpRM_F<0x84, "test", Xi8 , X86testpat>; def TEST16rm : BinOpRM_F<0x84, "test", Xi16, X86testpat>; def TEST32rm : BinOpRM_F<0x84, "test", Xi32, X86testpat>; def TEST64rm : BinOpRM_F<0x84, "test", Xi64, X86testpat>; def TEST8ri : BinOpRI_F<0xF6, "test", Xi8 , X86testpat, MRM0r>; def TEST16ri : BinOpRI_F<0xF6, "test", Xi16, X86testpat, MRM0r>; def TEST32ri : BinOpRI_F<0xF6, "test", Xi32, X86testpat, MRM0r>; def TEST64ri32 : BinOpRI_F<0xF6, "test", Xi64, X86testpat, MRM0r>; def TEST8mi : BinOpMI_F<"test", Xi8 , X86testpat, MRM0m, 0xF6>; def TEST16mi : BinOpMI_F<"test", Xi16, X86testpat, MRM0m, 0xF6>; def TEST32mi : BinOpMI_F<"test", Xi32, X86testpat, MRM0m, 0xF6>; def TEST64mi32 : BinOpMI_F<"test", Xi64, X86testpat, MRM0m, 0xF6>; // When testing the result of EXTRACT_SUBREG sub_8bit_hi, make sure the // register class is constrained to GR8_NOREX. let isPseudo = 1 in def TEST8ri_NOREX : I<0, Pseudo, (outs), (ins GR8_NOREX:$src, i8imm:$mask), "", [], IIC_BIN_NONMEM>, Sched<[WriteALU]>; } // Defs = [EFLAGS] def TEST8i8 : BinOpAI<0xA8, "test", Xi8 , AL, "{$src, %al|al, $src}">; def TEST16i16 : BinOpAI<0xA8, "test", Xi16, AX, "{$src, %ax|ax, $src}">; def TEST32i32 : BinOpAI<0xA8, "test", Xi32, EAX, "{$src, %eax|eax, $src}">; def TEST64i32 : BinOpAI<0xA8, "test", Xi64, RAX, "{$src, %rax|rax, $src}">; } // isCompare -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140422/8069588a/attachment.html>
Craig Topper
2014-Apr-22 15:39 UTC
[LLVMdev] where is F7 opcode for TEST instruction on X86?
If memory serves the Xi16, Xi32, and Xi64 types cause some magic inside of BinOpMI_F(or classes it inherits from) to OR a 1 into the LSB of the opcode. On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> wrote:> hi, > > at the moment, TEST instruction is defined with 0xf7 opcode, as > demonstrated below. > > $ echo "0xf7 0xc0 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x22"|./Release+Asserts/bin/llvm-mc > -disassemble -arch=x86 > .section __TEXT,__text,regular,pure_instructions > testl $570425344, %eax ## imm = 0x22000000 > > however, i cannot find anywhere this F7 opcode is defined in > lib/Target/X86/X86InstrArithmetic.td. > we only have TEST defined with F6 & other opcode like below. > > any hint please? > > thanks. > > > let isCompare = 1 in { > let Defs = [EFLAGS] in { > let isCommutable = 1 in { > def TEST8rr : BinOpRR_F<0x84, "test", Xi8 , X86testpat, MRMSrcReg>; > def TEST16rr : BinOpRR_F<0x84, "test", Xi16, X86testpat, MRMSrcReg>; > def TEST32rr : BinOpRR_F<0x84, "test", Xi32, X86testpat, MRMSrcReg>; > def TEST64rr : BinOpRR_F<0x84, "test", Xi64, X86testpat, MRMSrcReg>; > } // isCommutable > > def TEST8rm : BinOpRM_F<0x84, "test", Xi8 , X86testpat>; > def TEST16rm : BinOpRM_F<0x84, "test", Xi16, X86testpat>; > def TEST32rm : BinOpRM_F<0x84, "test", Xi32, X86testpat>; > def TEST64rm : BinOpRM_F<0x84, "test", Xi64, X86testpat>; > > def TEST8ri : BinOpRI_F<0xF6, "test", Xi8 , X86testpat, MRM0r>; > def TEST16ri : BinOpRI_F<0xF6, "test", Xi16, X86testpat, MRM0r>; > def TEST32ri : BinOpRI_F<0xF6, "test", Xi32, X86testpat, MRM0r>; > def TEST64ri32 : BinOpRI_F<0xF6, "test", Xi64, X86testpat, MRM0r>; > > def TEST8mi : BinOpMI_F<"test", Xi8 , X86testpat, MRM0m, 0xF6>; > def TEST16mi : BinOpMI_F<"test", Xi16, X86testpat, MRM0m, 0xF6>; > def TEST32mi : BinOpMI_F<"test", Xi32, X86testpat, MRM0m, 0xF6>; > def TEST64mi32 : BinOpMI_F<"test", Xi64, X86testpat, MRM0m, 0xF6>; > > // When testing the result of EXTRACT_SUBREG sub_8bit_hi, make sure the > // register class is constrained to GR8_NOREX. > let isPseudo = 1 in > def TEST8ri_NOREX : I<0, Pseudo, (outs), (ins GR8_NOREX:$src, > i8imm:$mask), > "", [], IIC_BIN_NONMEM>, Sched<[WriteALU]>; > } // Defs = [EFLAGS] > > def TEST8i8 : BinOpAI<0xA8, "test", Xi8 , AL, > "{$src, %al|al, $src}">; > def TEST16i16 : BinOpAI<0xA8, "test", Xi16, AX, > "{$src, %ax|ax, $src}">; > def TEST32i32 : BinOpAI<0xA8, "test", Xi32, EAX, > "{$src, %eax|eax, $src}">; > def TEST64i32 : BinOpAI<0xA8, "test", Xi64, RAX, > "{$src, %rax|rax, $src}">; > } // isCompare > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >-- ~Craig -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140422/f63485ea/attachment.html>
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com>wrote:> If memory serves the Xi16, Xi32, and Xi64 types cause some magic inside of > BinOpMI_F(or classes it inherits from) to OR a 1 into the LSB of the opcode. > >Thanks a lot, Craig!> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> hi, >> >> at the moment, TEST instruction is defined with 0xf7 opcode, as >> demonstrated below. >> >> $ echo "0xf7 0xc0 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x22"|./Release+Asserts/bin/llvm-mc >> -disassemble -arch=x86 >> .section __TEXT,__text,regular,pure_instructions >> testl $570425344, %eax ## imm = 0x22000000 >> >> however, i cannot find anywhere this F7 opcode is defined in >> lib/Target/X86/X86InstrArithmetic.td. >> we only have TEST defined with F6 & other opcode like below. >> >> any hint please? >> >> thanks. >> >> >> let isCompare = 1 in { >> let Defs = [EFLAGS] in { >> let isCommutable = 1 in { >> def TEST8rr : BinOpRR_F<0x84, "test", Xi8 , X86testpat, MRMSrcReg>; >> def TEST16rr : BinOpRR_F<0x84, "test", Xi16, X86testpat, MRMSrcReg>; >> def TEST32rr : BinOpRR_F<0x84, "test", Xi32, X86testpat, MRMSrcReg>; >> def TEST64rr : BinOpRR_F<0x84, "test", Xi64, X86testpat, MRMSrcReg>; >> } // isCommutable >> >> def TEST8rm : BinOpRM_F<0x84, "test", Xi8 , X86testpat>; >> def TEST16rm : BinOpRM_F<0x84, "test", Xi16, X86testpat>; >> def TEST32rm : BinOpRM_F<0x84, "test", Xi32, X86testpat>; >> def TEST64rm : BinOpRM_F<0x84, "test", Xi64, X86testpat>; >> >> def TEST8ri : BinOpRI_F<0xF6, "test", Xi8 , X86testpat, MRM0r>; >> def TEST16ri : BinOpRI_F<0xF6, "test", Xi16, X86testpat, MRM0r>; >> def TEST32ri : BinOpRI_F<0xF6, "test", Xi32, X86testpat, MRM0r>; >> def TEST64ri32 : BinOpRI_F<0xF6, "test", Xi64, X86testpat, MRM0r>; >> >> def TEST8mi : BinOpMI_F<"test", Xi8 , X86testpat, MRM0m, 0xF6>; >> def TEST16mi : BinOpMI_F<"test", Xi16, X86testpat, MRM0m, 0xF6>; >> def TEST32mi : BinOpMI_F<"test", Xi32, X86testpat, MRM0m, 0xF6>; >> def TEST64mi32 : BinOpMI_F<"test", Xi64, X86testpat, MRM0m, 0xF6>; >> >> // When testing the result of EXTRACT_SUBREG sub_8bit_hi, make sure >> the >> // register class is constrained to GR8_NOREX. >> let isPseudo = 1 in >> def TEST8ri_NOREX : I<0, Pseudo, (outs), (ins GR8_NOREX:$src, >> i8imm:$mask), >> "", [], IIC_BIN_NONMEM>, Sched<[WriteALU]>; >> } // Defs = [EFLAGS] >> >> def TEST8i8 : BinOpAI<0xA8, "test", Xi8 , AL, >> "{$src, %al|al, $src}">; >> def TEST16i16 : BinOpAI<0xA8, "test", Xi16, AX, >> "{$src, %ax|ax, $src}">; >> def TEST32i32 : BinOpAI<0xA8, "test", Xi32, EAX, >> "{$src, %eax|eax, $src}">; >> def TEST64i32 : BinOpAI<0xA8, "test", Xi64, RAX, >> "{$src, %rax|rax, $src}">; >> } // isCompare >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >> >> > > > -- > ~Craig >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140424/3268855e/attachment.html>
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Taking over an x86 opcode for my own instruction
- retrieve rows from frame assuming criterion
- [LLVMdev] Missed optimization on array initialization
- retrieve rows from frame assuming criterion [corrected]
- R: retrieve rows from frame assuming criterion [corrected]