Adam Strzelecki
2013-Sep-12 15:17 UTC
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Detect Haswell subarchitecture (i.e. using -march=native)
Hello, This is my first patch on this list, however I've already submitted several trough bug tracking system. Since it probably needs some review and it's not a bug I am submitting it here. The main intent of this patch is to detect "core-avx2" platform on Haswell i7 CPUs when running -march=native. Currently it detects it as generic x86_64. lib/Support/Host.cpp: * Haswell is detected for CPUID Family 6 Model 60 * Similar to Ivy and Sandy Bridge we check for AVX2 since some Haswell Pentiums are SSE4.x only * I have marked HasAVX2 as "volatile", since otherwise it gets magically zeroed (by optimizer?) when compiling clang with latest clang build from trunk lib/Target/X86/X86Subtarget.cpp: * Also enabling X86::FeatureFastUAMem for Haswell Regards, -- Adam Strzelecki | nanoant.com | twitter.com/nanoant -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: llvm-detect-haswell.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1765 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130912/b6842ec0/attachment.obj>
Tim Northover
2013-Sep-12 16:02 UTC
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Detect Haswell subarchitecture (i.e. using -march=native)
Hi Adam,> * I have marked HasAVX2 as "volatile", since otherwise it gets > magically zeroed (by optimizer?) when compiling clang with latest > clang build from trunkThat's far more worrying to me than not being able to detect Haswell. I can't reproduce the problem here at the moment: both debug and release builds give identical assembly for Host.cpp. I don't suppose you could post the command-line clang is using to build Host.cpp (and perhaps the differing object files if you have them handy)? Cheers. Tim.
Adam Strzelecki
2013-Sep-12 16:28 UTC
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Detect Haswell subarchitecture (i.e. using -march=native)
> That's far more worrying to me than not being able to detect Haswell. > I can't reproduce the problem here at the moment: both debug and > release builds give identical assembly for Host.cpp.OK. I know the reason you cannot reproduce it, before posting the patch I've decided to check for AVX before checking AVX2, just not to cpuid AVX2 when we don't have AVX1 anyway. So the problem exists with following predicate: (1) bool HasAVX2 = !GetX86CpuIDAndInfo(0x7, &EAX, &EBX, &ECX, &EDX) && (EBX & 0x20); However it is working absolutely fine if I add "volatile": (2) volatile bool HasAVX2 = !GetX86CpuIDAndInfo(0x7, &EAX, &EBX, &ECX, &EDX) && (EBX & 0x20); Or add extra check for HasAVX: (3) bool HasAVX2 = HasAVX && !GetX86CpuIDAndInfo(0x7, &EAX, &EBX, &ECX, &EDX) && (EBX & 0x20); Attaching object files related to all of these cases below. Also attaching patch that removes volatile, but leaves HasAVX check that makes the code run fine here. My platform is Ubuntu 12.04 LTS 64-bit & i7-4470k. llvm[1]: Compiling Host.cpp for Release build if clang++ -I/home/ono/Documents/llvm/include -I/home/ono/Documents/llvm/lib/Support -I/tmp/llvm.q35LGwjHmR/include -I/tmp/llvm.q35LGwjHmR/lib/Support -DNDEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fPIC -Woverloaded-virtual -Wcast-qual -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-missing-field-initializers -c -MMD -MP -MF "/tmp/llvm.q35LGwjHmR/lib/Support/Release/Host.d.tmp" -MT "/tmp/llvm.q35LGwjHmR/lib/Support/Release/Host.o" -MT "/tmp/llvm.q35LGwjHmR/lib/Support/Release/Host.d" /home/ono/Documents/llvm/lib/Support/Host.cpp -o /tmp/llvm.q35LGwjHmR/lib/Support/Release/Host.o ; \ then /bin/mv -f "/tmp/llvm.q35LGwjHmR/lib/Support/Release/Host.d.tmp" "/tmp/llvm.q35LGwjHmR/lib/Support/Release/Host.d"; else /bin/rm "/tmp/llvm.q35LGwjHmR/lib/Support/Release/Host.d.tmp"; exit 1; fi Regards, -- Adam Strzelecki | nanoant.com | twitter.com/nanoant -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Host-objects.tbz2 Type: application/octet-stream Size: 6366 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130912/6c851eb1/attachment.obj> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: llvm-detect-haswell-r2.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1720 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130912/6c851eb1/attachment-0001.obj>
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [LLVMdev] [PATCH] Detect Haswell subarchitecture (i.e. using -march=native)
- [LLVMdev] [PATCH] Detect Haswell subarchitecture (i.e. using -march=native)
- [LLVMdev] [PATCH] Detect Haswell subarchitecture (i.e. using -march=native)
- [LLVMdev] [PATCH] Detect Haswell subarchitecture (i.e. using -march=native)
- [LLVMdev] [PATCH] Detect Haswell subarchitecture (i.e. using -march=native)