Jochen Wilhelmy
2011-Mar-18 22:43 UTC
[LLVMdev] new vector resize instruction could be useful
Hi! If I build a vector of some length (e.g. 4) from a vector of another length (e.g. 3) then I get tons of extractelement and insertelement instructions. since vectors of length 3 and 4 both map to an sse register it could be useful to introduce an instruction that changes the length of a vector, either truncating or extending by zero or undef values (whichever makes more sense). for lengths 3 and 4 this maps to no-op but could be useful for e.g. concatenating two vectors of length 8 to a vector of length 16 by first resizing to length 16 and then using shufflevector. what do you think? -jochen
Eli Friedman
2011-Mar-18 22:55 UTC
[LLVMdev] new vector resize instruction could be useful
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Jochen Wilhelmy <j.wilhelmy at arcor.de> wrote:> Hi! > > If I build a vector of some length (e.g. 4) from a vector of another > length (e.g. 3) > then I get tons of extractelement and insertelement instructions. since > vectors of length 3 and 4 both map to an sse register it could be useful to > introduce an instruction that changes the length of a vector, either > truncating > or extending by zero or undef values (whichever makes more sense). > for lengths 3 and 4 this maps to no-op but could be useful for e.g. > concatenating > two vectors of length 8 to a vector of length 16 by first resizing to > length 16 > and then using shufflevector. > what do you think?You should already be able to use shufflevector with the output length different from the inputs. -Eli
Maybe Matching Threads
- [LLVMdev] new vector resize instruction could be useful
- [LLVMdev] vector optimization
- [LLVMdev] loop vectorizer: Unexpected extract/insertelement
- [LLVMdev] RegisterCoalescing Pass seems to ignore part of CFG.
- [LLVMdev] loop vectorizer: Unexpected extract/insertelement