search for: concatenating

We have been using samba 2.2.7 for awhile now with ldap no problem. We are ready to move to Samba 3 though, and this is where the trouble begins. We do not have a domain set up. We have a few samba boxes and they just use the ldap servers to get their passwords from. (no roaming desktops or anything like that.) I did a bit of reading up and see that I need to run the convertSambaAccount script

Hi, first time poster here. During my time using R, I have always found string concatenation to be (what I feel is) unnecessarily complicated by requiring the use of the paste() or similar commands. When searching for how to concatenate strings in R, several top search results show answers that say to write your own function or override the '+' operator. Sample code like the following

...paste and paste0 functions, but they yielded elementwise concatenation such as "a1b1","a2b2" I am wondering that is there an efficient way of doing my wish, for instance without using for loop etc. Best Ozgur -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/concatenating-two-vectors-tp4643139.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Gabor Csardi writes: > Btw. for some motivation, here is a (surely incomplete) list of > languages with '+' as the string concatenation operator: > > ALGOL 68, BASIC, C++, C#, Cobra, Pascal, Object Pascal, Eiffel, Go, > JavaScript, Java, Python, Turing, Ruby, Windows Powers hell, > Objective-C, F#, Sc-ala, Ya. The situation for R is rather different from that of a

Hello, the last 2-3 days i have a saden problem with logwatch wich i call through a cron job. when i ran the cronjob i get this continues error for the script : ---- Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /etc/log.d/scripts/shared/applystddate line 43, <STDIN> line 26062. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at

I have the following environment # cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5.8 (Final) # uname -r 2.6.18-308.4.1.el5 I have installed smbldap-tools from http://download.gna.org/smbldap-tools/packages/el5/smbldap-tools-0.9.8-1.el5.noarch.rpm. Configured OpenLDAP, but when I try to populate LDAP directory I got the following error messages # smbldap-populate -a Administrator -g 10000 -l 11111 -r

> Have you changed anything during that time? Is this on CentOS-3 or > CentOS-4? ... and what is: > > cat /etc/redhat-release I have the latest release [ CentOS release 4.3 (Final) ] i didn't change anything just the regular updates... ------------------------------ Message: 17 Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 12:21:47 +0300 From: "?????? > ????? Internet" <web at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46 Summary: ..patch-o-matic: nfnetlink_conntrack.c or -.h ... compile failure: Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component:

Hi, I have multiple ogg/theora files, with different bitrate. That is the big problem, because I want to broadcast them using ezstream/icecast and the connection between ezstream and icecast is always lost when switching between files. They have the same resolution but different quality. Is there a tool to concatenate/normalize several files to a big homogeneous one? -- A powerfull GroupWare,

I have this: <%= @tech_standard.category + " " + @tech_standard.point + "." + @tech_standard.subpoint %> I get this error: cannot convert Fixnum into String point and subpoint are number. How do I concatenate those values? Seth Buntin Web Resources Coordinator Kentucky Academy of Technology Education Murray State University --------------

J'aimerais savoir si la fonction merge() est la seule disponible pour concatener des tableaux de donn?es? Est-ce normal que l'ex?cution soit lente?

I have this typical problem of joining a number of vectors with similar names - a1, a2,..., a10 - which should be concatenated into one. Using c(a1,a2,a3,a4,a5,a6,a,a8,a9,a10) naturally works, but I would like to do it with less manual input. My attempts to use paste() gives a vector of the vector names, see below. The question is how to do the the concatenation? Any suggestions?

...My peace of code is as follow: rawdata <- list.files("./data") for (i in rawdata) { mat[ ] <- read.table(paste(i ,sep="")) } At the end of the loop I have just one column. What I'm doing wrong? Thanks, Fred -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/concatenating-multiple-columns-from-files-tp24748542p24748542.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi Joshua, On 06/16/2015 03:32 PM, Joshua Bradley wrote: > Hi, first time poster here. During my time using R, I have always found > string concatenation to be (what I feel is) unnecessarily complicated by > requiring the use of the paste() or similar commands. > > > When searching for how to concatenate strings in R, several top search > results show answers that say to

Dear R gurus How do I do simple string concatenation in R? For example: A = "klm" B = "jjj" How can I assign a value to C such that C == "klmjjj" is True? Thank you Arie [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

... $ : num [1:16001] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...  $ : num [1:16001] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...  $ : num [1:16001] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... str(Part1$dataset) List of 3  $ : num [1:16001] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...  $ : num [1:16001] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...  $ : num [1:16001] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... I tried concatenating those with: > str(cbind(Part1$datase,Part2$dataset)) List of 6  $ : num [1:16001] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...  $ : num [1:16001] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...  $ : num [1:16001] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...  $ : num [1:16001] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...  $ : num [1:16001] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...  $ : num [1:1600...

Hi! Some bootloaders (eg. syslinux) have to ability to load multiple ramdisks, effectively concatenating them. This makes it very easy to augment ramdisks, like eg. customizing an installer. Can I do something similar with XEN? Separating the ramdisk cpio arhives with commas in the config file didn''t work... -- Thanks, Feri. _______________________________________________ Xen-users maili...

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote: [...] > > If I was to override `+` to concatenate strings, I would make it stick > to the recycling scheme used by arithmetic and comparison operators > (which is the most sensible of all IMO). Yeah, I agree, paste's recycling rules are sometimes painful. This could be "fixed" with a nice

Bad choice of words I'm afraid. What I'm ultimately pushing for is a feature request. To allow string concatenation with '+' by default. Sure I can write my own string addition function (like the example I posted previously) but I use it so often that I end up putting it in every script I write. It is ultimately a matter of readability and syntactic sugar I guess. As an example, I

...n description' while the latter could very well be a 'Implicit location description' (e.g. the sign extension from lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp) in which case a DW_OP_deref of some sort would be needed in between. To me it seems that there is no clear way of knowing what to do when concatenating because there is no clear way of knowing the kind of the existing expression (is it Memory, Register or Implicit). Without having thought too much about it it would seem that having additional meta ops in the expression for the sole purpose of identifying what kind it is would be helpful when con...