llvm dev - Oct 2009 - [LLVMdev] Any objections to removing 'win32/...' subtree from LLVM?

Daniel Dunbar tells me it's no longer in use, and poking around shows
that it is extremely out of sync with trunk source code.

No objection.
I'm studying LLVM on Win32 using visual studio.
CMake works well for it.


On Oct 26, 7:44 am, Chandler Carruth <chandl... at google.com>
wrote:
> Daniel Dunbar tells me it's no longer in use, and poking around shows
> that it is extremely out of sync with trunk source code.
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVM... at cs.uiuc.edu      
 http://llvm.cs.uiuc.eduhttp://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

FYI, I'll plan on removing this subtree on Monday of next week if no
one else chimes in requesting a reprieve...

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:59 PM, PyLLVM <pyllvm at gmail.com>
wrote:
> No objection.
> I'm studying LLVM on Win32 using visual studio.
> CMake works well for it.
>
>
> On Oct 26, 7:44 am, Chandler Carruth <chandl... at google.com> wrote:
>> Daniel Dunbar tells me it's no longer in use, and poking around
shows
>> that it is extremely out of sync with trunk source code.
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVM... at cs.uiuc.edu      
 http://llvm.cs.uiuc.eduhttp://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>