search for: repriev

FYI, I'll plan on removing this subtree on Monday of next week if no one else chimes in requesting a reprieve... On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:59 PM, PyLLVM <pyllvm at gmail.com> wrote: > No objection. > I'm studying LLVM on Win32 using visual studio. > CMake works well for it. > > > On Oct 26, 7:44 am, Chandler Carruth <chandl... at google.com> wrote: >> Daniel Dunbar...

Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> writes: > FYI, I'll plan on removing this subtree on Monday of next week if no > one else chimes in requesting a reprieve... The Visual C++ project files are still there. Anyone objected by private e-mail? Can we know the reasons just in case we can enhance the cmake build on accordance? In the past, the only reason for not removing win32/ was that the cmake-generated project files are not relocatable. As the win32...

On Nov 6, 2009, at 9:10 AM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> writes: > >> FYI, I'll plan on removing this subtree on Monday of next week if no >> one else chimes in requesting a reprieve... > > The Visual C++ project files are still there. > > Anyone objected by private e-mail? Can we know the reasons just in > case > we can enhance the cmake build on accordance? In the past, the only > reason for not removing win32/ was that the cmake-generated project >...

Daniel Dunbar tells me it's no longer in use, and poking around shows that it is extremely out of sync with trunk source code.

No objection. I'm studying LLVM on Win32 using visual studio. CMake works well for it. On Oct 26, 7:44 am, Chandler Carruth <chandl... at google.com> wrote: > Daniel Dunbar tells me it's no longer in use, and poking around shows > that it is extremely out of sync with trunk source code. > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list

...come up before and hopefully will not again ;-) We have had situations where people have had an NT4-style PDC and linux fileservers and they have upgraded to AD without problem. You, for various reasons, could not, but have found a way around the problem. I would urge you to consider this as a reprieve and a breathing point, then find a better fix for your problem, it may be that this is done on a company basis rather than on a department basis. Rowland

...the end of May 2010 to the end of June 2010. Due to an unfortunate limitation in the freebsd-update(8) utility, it will warn about the upcoming EoL based on the original end-of-May date until the next time a security update is pushed out for 7.2-RELEASE. Please note that this is only a one month reprieve; we expect 7.3-RELEASE to be announced later this month, and users of 7.2-RELEASE are advised to utilize the months of April, May, and June to ensure that their systems are upgraded before 7.2-RELEASE ceases to be supported. Once they are released, 7.3-RELEASE and 8.1-RELEASE will both receive &q...

...rrect, this may be another manifestation of one of the bugs fixed in 3.5.8: o Fix Winbind crash bug when no DC is available (bug #7730). So, if you are using Samba 3.5.x and are having winbind problems, ensure that the DNS servers that you are using are non-redirecting. It might give you a reprieve until 3.5.8 comes to your distribution. Dale

...the end of May 2010 to the end of June 2010. Due to an unfortunate limitation in the freebsd-update(8) utility, it will warn about the upcoming EoL based on the original end-of-May date until the next time a security update is pushed out for 7.2-RELEASE. Please note that this is only a one month reprieve; we expect 7.3-RELEASE to be announced later this month, and users of 7.2-RELEASE are advised to utilize the months of April, May, and June to ensure that their systems are upgraded before 7.2-RELEASE ceases to be supported. Once they are released, 7.3-RELEASE and 8.1-RELEASE will both receive &q...

On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 3:04 PM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 05/07/2019 20:00, Ryan via samba wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 2:32 PM Rowland penny via samba < > > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> On 05/07/2019 18:50, Ryan via samba wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Rowland penny via samba

Hi Last week I installed Asterisk (release1) with digium t100p single span T1 (wct1xxp) board on Dell GX270 pc configured for PRI. Asterisk/t100p is currently the only user of the t1 line. All worked well for about a half a day, PSTN to SIP phones to non-SIP IP phones etc. Alas, since then I consistently get multitudes of blue alarms on all b-channels followed by a loss of d-channel: Aug 31