search for: chimes

This marks the first community contribution to the Chime visualization tool for DTrace. A huge thanks to Bill Rushmore for creating a new main window for Chime. Previously a simple stack of buttons, Chime now uses the Netbeans Matisse layout to present a scrollable list and a description pane. When you create a new display, you can now provide helpful descriptive text. Bill also pointed out

Would Studio 10, or Studio 11 be preferable to build? This message posted from opensolaris.org

I am trying to create some new Chime displays using the new display wizard. I''m practicing by basing them off an existing display. When I get to the end of the wizard and press finish, I get an NoSuchMethodException: org.opensolaris.chime.util.TableSortCriteria.getAscending error (more details below). I''ve watched Tom Erickson''s screencast several times, and read

Hi , I have installed the chime for both sparc/x64 . However when I startup the chime, I get the following error. "Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/opensolaris/os/dtrace/LocalConsumer " I added all the jar files in the /opt/OSOL0chime/lib/java by for i in `ls *.jar` do export CLASSPATH=$CLASSPATH:$i done The error persists. Does any one

Hi I see some distro's, like Ubuntu has a nice short chime / sound when a machine is fully booted. How / where can I setup, activate, or create such a boot up sound? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers CEO, SoftDux Web: http://www.SoftDux.com Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff, or visit http://www.WebHostingTalk.co.za for Web Hosting stugg

The FCS version (1.0) of the NetBeans DTrace GUI Plugin + Chime is published on the NetBeans Update Center. The new release contains more than 30 new Chime displays that can be used to debug and tune applications that are written in native and dynamic languages such as Ruby and Python. For more information please see the URL below: http://dtrace.netbeans.org Thanks, __Nasser -- This message

I've come across a handful of tests that fail at our site. I consider this one the worst because the process does not return. The patch below simply bypasss the test, but the errors in the out file are included as well. I suspect this is due to more or tighter ulimits on this system. But I'm not sure if this is result of different expectations (kernel/userland) of what should be done in

Hi, Does anybody know of a VoIP compatible doorbell or door intercom unit? I've contemplated buying a cheap SIP phone, ripping it apart, and putting it inside an IP66 sealed unit... It would need: - At least one speed-dial key, or some way to make every button dial the same extension number - PoE (power over ethernet), so I can power it off the central switch - cheap enough to rip apart

Xen will not be in update 4. We are pushing towards integrating into Nevada sometime this summer. We''re actively working on getting another release out to OpenSolaris. I have my latest attempt at building an ISO image spinning in another window right now. This new release will be based on Nevada build 66. It''s been a ridiculously long time since our last release, and I

On 15.10.2008, at 14.01, Pertti Kellomäki wrote: > Tatu Vaajalahti wrote: >> With this program llvm-gcc -O2 optimizes test2 away even though it's >> address is taken in program (gcc-4.2 does not, neither does llvm-gcc >> with -O or -O0): >> >> >> #include <stdio.h> >> >> static const char test1 = 'x'; >> static const char

> True, but note that it is the address of a variable that is used, not > the value. Yes, but why do you think they should get a different address? I can understand that it is surprising that they do, but determining whether this is legal or not requires reading the language standard. Hopefully a language lawyer can chime in and say whether this transform is valid or not. Ciao,

At 9/12/2020 09:45 PM, Mehdi AMINI wrote: >I'm on Windows. Is there a way to set up that hook? > >Ah sorry I'm not familiar enough with Windows, maybe someone else can chime in (and then we could update the doc as well). I'm standing by waiting to learn what to do about the broken build . . .

Please chime in if you've ever wished for digium to make a 4-port daughter board with a combination of 2FXO AND 2FXS ports on the same card. When using the 800 series cards, one must either choose 4-port permutations of FXS/FXO, OR one must give up 2 valuable ports. In other words, when you add ONE 100-series daughter board, you give up TWO of your physical ports. Is there a technical

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 30 January 2015 at 20:43, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com> > wrote: > > Last time we brought this up, there was only partial consensus, and then > > someone arbitrarily declared total consensus (without compelling > arguments > > in any particular direction)

Greetings All, My problem is trying to mount an SMB share from Fedora Core5 to a Windows 98 Machine. Before upgrading from FC4 to FC5 everything worked. I have searched around and it appears that the smbmount and mount -t smbfs options have been deprecated in Samba 3.0.22-1 in favor of CIFS. The command I have been trying now is: mount -t cifs //192.168.0.126/laptop /mnt/share -o username=chime

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > Breaking this out into a separate thread since it's kind of a separate > issue, and to make sure people see it. > > If you have opinions on this, please chime in. I'd like to collect as > many arguments here as possible to make a good decision. The main > contestants are 4.0 and 3.10, and

So, I sat down to use set_fixture_class, and it bombed on the first thing I tried: set_fixture_class :content_drafts => "Article::Draft" I made a quick patch, and I''d appreciate a quick run through your tests to make sure it doesn''t disturb anything: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4095 As I was typing this, I realized that the string gives us no benefits. I

Breaking this out into a separate thread since it's kind of a separate issue, and to make sure people see it. If you have opinions on this, please chime in. I'd like to collect as many arguments here as possible to make a good decision. The main contestants are 4.0 and 3.10, and I've seen folks being equally surprised by both. Brain-dump so far: - After LLVM 1.9 came 2.0, and after

FYI, I'll plan on removing this subtree on Monday of next week if no one else chimes in requesting a reprieve... On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:59 PM, PyLLVM <pyllvm at gmail.com> wrote: > No objection. > I'm studying LLVM on Win32 using visual studio. > CMake works well for it. > > > On Oct 26, 7:44 am, Chandler Carruth <chandl... at google.com> wrote...

Yes, I know it sounds silly, but I need to enable java support in the browsers- either IE or Firefox- that I'm running through Wine from Linux. It's because a site I want to access requires the Chime plugin, available only for Windows, but also a functional Java VM. When I run the Java SDK or JRE installers through wine, the installation gets to a certain point and then stops because