search for: r86358

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "r86358".

2009 Nov 07
1
[LLVMdev] Any objections to removing 'win32/...' subtree from LLVM?
...ordance? In the past, the only > reason for not removing win32/ was that the cmake-generated project > files are not relocatable. As the win32/ project files seem out of > date > for months now, I reckon that the user who had that requirement > switched > to cmake. Removed in r86358. I don't know what happened to Chandler. -Chris
2009 Oct 29
2
[LLVMdev] Any objections to removing 'win32/...' subtree from LLVM?
FYI, I'll plan on removing this subtree on Monday of next week if no one else chimes in requesting a reprieve... On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:59 PM, PyLLVM <pyllvm at gmail.com> wrote: > No objection. > I'm studying LLVM on Win32 using visual studio. > CMake works well for it. > > > On Oct 26, 7:44 am, Chandler Carruth <chandl... at google.com> wrote: >>
2009 Nov 06
0
[LLVMdev] Any objections to removing 'win32/...' subtree from LLVM?
Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> writes: > FYI, I'll plan on removing this subtree on Monday of next week if no > one else chimes in requesting a reprieve... The Visual C++ project files are still there. Anyone objected by private e-mail? Can we know the reasons just in case we can enhance the cmake build on accordance? In the past, the only reason for not removing