> From: "Wilfred L. Guerin" <wilfredguerin at gmail.com> > Subject: [LLVMdev] LLVM Expansions > > It is very relevant that LLVM look into handeling HDL and other binary > and analogue operation modeling capbilities, as well as expand thiswhat is binary? you mean digital right?> Without confirming the true characteristics of the lower structure > types and operating characteristics (especially physical > implementation) it is not possible to coherently optimize complex code > sequences, especially with wide varieties of influences on abstract > operation.What a mess! ARE YOU MAN OR BOT??? I may be tired (late night, coffee cup toll rises!) BUT MAN YOU ARE INCOMPREHENSIBLE. Dear LLVMers are you sure this guy exists?> Obviously, all characteristics of physical system implmentation should > be included in the standard techniques....driniking more coffee...> More importantly, given most of that model data (result values) is > fairly finite and known variable data ranges for most target > implementations, one must propogate these analytics to higher models."data ranges"? In the essence of what can be extracted from "bitwidth analysis". Oh, man, your text is certainly machine-generated. Have you translated this from s'thing to English, and acquired the nice nop de plume? These are my thoughts to your highly entropic stuff. In the slight case you are man, please refine on your thoughts. Cheers, bot boy! Nikolaos Kavvadias
perhaps one should ask why a compiler has not compiled itself to binary and requires a 3rd party compiler to exist. Someone please send me lli that works on a pxa270 (which has never been tested?) and make sure it runs in PocketPC(win) so I dont have to wait another 20 hours to compile a damned compiler. On 7/24/07, nkavv at physics.auth.gr <nkavv at physics.auth.gr> wrote:> > From: "Wilfred L. Guerin" <wilfredguerin at gmail.com> > > Subject: [LLVMdev] LLVM Expansions > > > > It is very relevant that LLVM look into handeling HDL and other binary > > and analogue operation modeling capbilities, as well as expand this > > what is binary? you mean digital right? > > > Without confirming the true characteristics of the lower structure > > types and operating characteristics (especially physical > > implementation) it is not possible to coherently optimize complex code > > sequences, especially with wide varieties of influences on abstract > > operation. > > What a mess! ARE YOU MAN OR BOT??? > I may be tired (late night, coffee cup toll rises!) BUT MAN YOU ARE > INCOMPREHENSIBLE. > > Dear LLVMers are you sure this guy exists? > > > Obviously, all characteristics of physical system implmentation should > > be included in the standard techniques. > ...driniking more coffee... > > > More importantly, given most of that model data (result values) is > > fairly finite and known variable data ranges for most target > > implementations, one must propogate these analytics to higher models. > > "data ranges"? In the essence of what can be extracted from "bitwidth > analysis". > Oh, man, your text is certainly machine-generated. Have you translated this > from > s'thing to English, and acquired the nice nop de plume? > > These are my thoughts to your highly entropic stuff. In the slight case you > are > man, please refine on your thoughts. > > Cheers, bot boy! > Nikolaos Kavvadias > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >
On Jul 24, 2007, at 8:34 PM, Wilfred L. Guerin wrote:> perhaps one should ask why a compiler has not compiled itself to > binary and requires a 3rd party compiler to exist.LLVM has compiled itself to "binary".> Someone please send me lli that works on a pxa270No.> (which has never been tested?) and make sure it runs in PocketPC > (win) so I dont have to > wait another 20 hours to compile a damned compiler.You've chosen a poor platform to compile a compiler on. -bw
Hi Nikolaos,> What a mess! ARE YOU MAN OR BOT??? > I may be tired (late night, coffee cup toll rises!) BUT MAN YOU ARE > INCOMPREHENSIBLE. > ... > Cheers, bot boy!If you're tired and have to resort to shouting and insults then don't post. Just delete the email or wait until you're less tired and consider again. LLVMdev is a friendly place. Let's keep it that way. If a newcomer crops up with questions and comments you don't understand then explain so nicely without using ad hominem attacks, or let someone else reply. Cheers, Ralph.
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Ralph Corderoy wrote:> LLVMdev is a friendly place. Let's keep it that way. If a newcomer > crops up with questions and comments you don't understand then explain > so nicely without using ad hominem attacks, or let someone else reply.Totally agreed! -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/