Can Microsoft Visual Studio be a good tool for making a backend for an
architecture?
Thanks,
Seung
---- Original message ---->Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:44:48 -0700
>From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org>
>Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio
>To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
>
>Andreas Fredriksson wrote:
>> On 3/12/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote:
>>
>>> That's what we do. We define it in
llvm/lib/System/Win32/Win32.h, which
>>> in included by every file that uses the Win32 API. There is no
reason
>>> for you to redefine it. Changing it to an earlier version will
cause
>>> build failures, changing it to a later version will have no effect,
>>> other than to permit the use of more recent Win32 APIs that will
prevent
>>> LLVM from running on versions as old as Windows 2000.
>>
>> Yes; my point was merely that in some build environments it's
>> convenient to just define it to , say, Windows XP all across the
>> solution with a property sheet (as we had done).
>
>But why modify our solution to make this change? How is it convenient
>to change something that worked, and in the process create a problem
>you'd like us to fix? And, of course, when you pull the 2.0 tarball,
>you'll have to make the change all over again :)
>>
>> // A
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>LLVM Developers mailing list
>LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev