similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio

I successfully build llvm from cvs using vs2005 and stlport. I also had a couple of issues, but most were due to outdated project files. I also had to implement code for the alloca instruction. On 3/10/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > > The recent issues concern the head revision, post 1.9. As no one has > ever submitted patches to fix 2005 problems with the 1.9

Thank you for your kind explanation. I did it as you mentioned. That is, I set '-march=x86 hello.bc' in the Command Arguments. (I also set my compiled LLC, i.e., LLVM_ROOT_DIR\win32\debug\llc.exe, in the property name Command.) But, when I made a breakpoint in main( ) of llc.cpp and then started to debug I found the 'InputFilename'(llc.cpp:176) is shown like {???}. Therefore it

The recent issues concern the head revision, post 1.9. As no one has ever submitted patches to fix 2005 problems with the 1.9 release, it is safe to say they still exist. Andreas Fredriksson wrote: > On 3/10/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: >> It is, if only because it's the version I use, but 2005 is supposed to >> work also. That being said, I

Andreas Fredriksson wrote: > On 3/11/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: >> No, the problem with StoreSDNode was that an argument as being called >> Value, >> which hid the class Value later on in the argument list. This also >> broke >> 2003 and was fixed a while ago. > > Ok, I didn't know that. We've been using the 1.9 tarball

I just wonder that Visual Studio .NET 2003 is the most compatible one among various MS Visual Studio versions for LLVM. Thank you Seung Jae Lee

On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 23:40 +0100, Andreas Fredriksson wrote: > On 3/10/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > > It is, if only because it's the version I use, but 2005 is supposed to > > work also. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it > > doesn't due to recent STL issues. Versions prior to 2003 won't work. > >

On 3/10/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > It is, if only because it's the version I use, but 2005 is supposed to > work also. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it > doesn't due to recent STL issues. Versions prior to 2003 won't work. I'm using the basic stuff (just libraries, 1.9) with 2005, although we had to fix a few

On 3/12/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > Just to make clear, there are no problems building 1.9 with VS 2003, nor > are there any problems as I write this. I'm fairly sure we grabbed the 1.9 tarball off the website, but I could be wrong. > That's what we do. We define it in llvm/lib/System/Win32/Win32.h, which > in included by every file that uses the

On 3/11/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > No, the problem with StoreSDNode was that an argument as being called Value, > which hid the class Value later on in the argument list. This also broke > 2003 and was fixed a while ago. Ok, I didn't know that. We've been using the 1.9 tarball version, as I said. > _WIN32_WINNT is not supposed to be predefined,

No, No... That's OK. I appreciate your concerns. Seung Jae Lee ---- Original message ---- >Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:30:59 -0700 >From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] adding a target for "-march=" option in Visual Studio (Resolved) >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >Seung Jae Lee wrote:

Jeff Cohen wrote: > The recent issues concern the head revision, post 1.9. As no one has > ever submitted patches to fix 2005 problems with the 1.9 release, it is > safe to say they still exist. For the 1.5 release I submitted patches that made everything compile correctly with VS2005, I think there are some mails in the archives about the issues I ran into. I also submitted patches

Xi, I just installed VS2005 pro w/ SP1 for Win Vista. Thanks, Seung ---- Original message ---- >Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:36:43 +0800 >From: "Xi Wang" <xi.wang at gmail.com> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005? >To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >I'm sorry but did you

I use VS2005/Vista, which works well... Thx, Seung ---- Original message ---- >Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:02:29 +0800 >From: "Xi Wang" <xi.wang at gmail.com> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005? >To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >Hi there, > >Did anyone try

It is, if only because it's the version I use, but 2005 is supposed to work also. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it doesn't due to recent STL issues. Versions prior to 2003 won't work. Seung Jae Lee wrote: > I just wonder that Visual Studio .NET 2003 is the most compatible one among various MS Visual Studio versions for LLVM. > > Thank you >

No, the problem with StoreSDNode was that an argument as being called Value, which hid the class Value later on in the argument list. This also broke 2003 and was fixed a while ago. _WIN32_WINNT is not supposed to be predefined, so that warning shouldn't be occurring. I have never seen it myself, and a predefined value could be inappropriate. Most of the other changes seem to be about

I simply found it at: http://getgnuwin32.sourceforge.net/ Seung ---- Original message ---- >Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:11:04 -0800 >From: "Ted Neward" <ted at tedneward.com> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005? >To: "'LLVM Developers Mailing List'" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >I'm sorry,

I followed the steps in "Getting Started with the LLVM System using Microsoft Visual Studio" in the document in LLVM page. I made hello.c file exactly same shown in the page. I made hello.bc on UNIX and transferred it to my Windows computer. And I typed "llc -march=c hello.bc" (Of course, I downloaded the latest version of LLVM and compiled with VS before this.) But my command

Hola Seung, I don't know if 2.1 in particular worked. I updated the 2.2 win32 vstudio 2k5 files right before lockdown, so they should be building. You will need appropriate versions of flex and bison installed. I used the ones from getgnuwin32 on my machine. Good luck. Chuck. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf

Thanks--I was offline when I wrote it, couldn't Google. Found it in about 5 seconds once I was back online. Second question: I'm getting various build errors relating (it seems) to configuration: can't find windows.h and so forth. Where (or to whom) is the best place to report these and iterate until we fix them? Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking,

Hello all, Is there anyone has tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005? I did but not succeed due to some build errors. I seem to remember I read somewhere on this list it's compiled on VS2005 so I wonder... Have a good night. Thx, Seung