llvm dev - Dec 2004 - [LLVMdev] getDirectoryContents and renameFile needs to be implemented in Win32/Path.cpp

Hi Jeff,

We need to get getDirectoryContents and renameFile implemented from 
Unix/Path.cpp in Win32/Path.cpp, otherwise I can't get llvm-ar linked.

Henrik.


============================================================Henrik Bach
Open Source Developer

e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com
============================================================Got Freedom?
Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August
http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/
============================================================
_________________________________________________________________
Find det, du s�ger p� MSN S�g http://search.msn.dk

I suspect those aren't the only two.  I'll have to make a pass over 
Path.cpp to see what was added to the unix version and not to the win32 
version.

Henrik Bach wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> We need to get getDirectoryContents and renameFile implemented from 
> Unix/Path.cpp in Win32/Path.cpp, otherwise I can't get llvm-ar linked.
>
> Henrik.
>
>
> ============================================================> Henrik
Bach
> Open Source Developer
>
> e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com
> ============================================================> Got
Freedom?
> Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August
> http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/
> ============================================================>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Find det, du søger på MSN Søg http://search.msn.dk
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>

Indeed they weren't.  It's up to date now.

And now that I've done that I can't help but notice that Path.cpp is 
getting very Unix-centric in its interfaces, what with file permission 
bits and stuff.  This is going to cause problems if and when LLVM is 
ported to other operating systems, though I have to admit it's getting 
difficult to name viable operating systems it could get ported to that 
isn't some flavor of Unix.  But there are a few left...

Jeff Cohen wrote:
> I suspect those aren't the only two.  I'll have to make a pass over
> Path.cpp to see what was added to the unix version and not to the 
> win32 version.
>
> Henrik Bach wrote:
>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> We need to get getDirectoryContents and renameFile implemented from 
>> Unix/Path.cpp in Win32/Path.cpp, otherwise I can't get llvm-ar
linked.
>>
>> Henrik.
>>
>>
>> ============================================================>>
Henrik Bach
>> Open Source Developer
>>
>> e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com
>> ============================================================>>
Got Freedom?
>> Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August
>> http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/
>> ============================================================>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Find det, du søger på MSN Søg http://search.msn.dk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>