search for: getdirectorycont

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "getdirectorycont".

2004 Dec 30
2
[LLVMdev] getDirectoryContents and renameFile needs to be implemented in Win32/Path.cpp
Hi Jeff, We need to get getDirectoryContents and renameFile implemented from Unix/Path.cpp in Win32/Path.cpp, otherwise I can't get llvm-ar linked. Henrik. ============================================================= Henrik Bach Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com =======================================...
2004 Dec 30
0
[LLVMdev] getDirectoryContents and renameFile needs to be implemented in Win32/Path.cpp
I suspect those aren't the only two. I'll have to make a pass over Path.cpp to see what was added to the unix version and not to the win32 version. Henrik Bach wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > We need to get getDirectoryContents and renameFile implemented from > Unix/Path.cpp in Win32/Path.cpp, otherwise I can't get llvm-ar linked. > > Henrik. > > > ============================================================= > Henrik Bach > Open Source Developer > > e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotma...
2004 Dec 31
2
[LLVMdev] getDirectoryContents and renameFile needs to be implemented in Win32/Path.cpp
...re are a few left... Jeff Cohen wrote: > I suspect those aren't the only two. I'll have to make a pass over > Path.cpp to see what was added to the unix version and not to the > win32 version. > > Henrik Bach wrote: > >> Hi Jeff, >> >> We need to get getDirectoryContents and renameFile implemented from >> Unix/Path.cpp in Win32/Path.cpp, otherwise I can't get llvm-ar linked. >> >> Henrik. >> >> >> ============================================================= >> Henrik Bach >> Open Source Developer >> &g...
2004 Dec 31
0
[LLVMdev] getDirectoryContents and renameFile needs to be implemented in Win32/Path.cpp
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 20:46, Jeff Cohen wrote: > And now that I've done that I can't help but notice that Path.cpp is > getting very Unix-centric in its interfaces, what with file permission > bits and stuff. This is going to cause problems if and when LLVM is > ported to other operating systems, though I have to admit it's getting > difficult to name viable