Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "getdirectorycontents".
2004 Dec 30
2
[LLVMdev] getDirectoryContents and renameFile needs to be implemented in Win32/Path.cpp
Hi Jeff,
We need to get getDirectoryContents and renameFile implemented from
Unix/Path.cpp in Win32/Path.cpp, otherwise I can't get llvm-ar linked.
Henrik.
=============================================================
Henrik Bach
Open Source Developer
e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com
===========================================...
2004 Dec 30
0
[LLVMdev] getDirectoryContents and renameFile needs to be implemented in Win32/Path.cpp
I suspect those aren't the only two. I'll have to make a pass over
Path.cpp to see what was added to the unix version and not to the win32
version.
Henrik Bach wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> We need to get getDirectoryContents and renameFile implemented from
> Unix/Path.cpp in Win32/Path.cpp, otherwise I can't get llvm-ar linked.
>
> Henrik.
>
>
> =============================================================
> Henrik Bach
> Open Source Developer
>
> e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.c...
2004 Dec 31
2
[LLVMdev] getDirectoryContents and renameFile needs to be implemented in Win32/Path.cpp
...re are a few left...
Jeff Cohen wrote:
> I suspect those aren't the only two. I'll have to make a pass over
> Path.cpp to see what was added to the unix version and not to the
> win32 version.
>
> Henrik Bach wrote:
>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> We need to get getDirectoryContents and renameFile implemented from
>> Unix/Path.cpp in Win32/Path.cpp, otherwise I can't get llvm-ar linked.
>>
>> Henrik.
>>
>>
>> =============================================================
>> Henrik Bach
>> Open Source Developer
>>
>&g...
2004 Dec 31
0
[LLVMdev] getDirectoryContents and renameFile needs to be implemented in Win32/Path.cpp
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 20:46, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> And now that I've done that I can't help but notice that Path.cpp is
> getting very Unix-centric in its interfaces, what with file permission
> bits and stuff. This is going to cause problems if and when LLVM is
> ported to other operating systems, though I have to admit it's getting
> difficult to name viable