Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "renamefil".
Did you mean:
renamefile
2004 Dec 30
2
[LLVMdev] getDirectoryContents and renameFile needs to be implemented in Win32/Path.cpp
Hi Jeff,
We need to get getDirectoryContents and renameFile implemented from
Unix/Path.cpp in Win32/Path.cpp, otherwise I can't get llvm-ar linked.
Henrik.
=============================================================
Henrik Bach
Open Source Developer
e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com
=========================================================...
2004 Dec 30
0
[LLVMdev] getDirectoryContents and renameFile needs to be implemented in Win32/Path.cpp
I suspect those aren't the only two. I'll have to make a pass over
Path.cpp to see what was added to the unix version and not to the win32
version.
Henrik Bach wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> We need to get getDirectoryContents and renameFile implemented from
> Unix/Path.cpp in Win32/Path.cpp, otherwise I can't get llvm-ar linked.
>
> Henrik.
>
>
> =============================================================
> Henrik Bach
> Open Source Developer
>
> e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com
> ======...
2004 Dec 31
2
[LLVMdev] getDirectoryContents and renameFile needs to be implemented in Win32/Path.cpp
...f Cohen wrote:
> I suspect those aren't the only two. I'll have to make a pass over
> Path.cpp to see what was added to the unix version and not to the
> win32 version.
>
> Henrik Bach wrote:
>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> We need to get getDirectoryContents and renameFile implemented from
>> Unix/Path.cpp in Win32/Path.cpp, otherwise I can't get llvm-ar linked.
>>
>> Henrik.
>>
>>
>> =============================================================
>> Henrik Bach
>> Open Source Developer
>>
>> e-mail: hen...
2004 Dec 31
0
[LLVMdev] getDirectoryContents and renameFile needs to be implemented in Win32/Path.cpp
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 20:46, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> And now that I've done that I can't help but notice that Path.cpp is
> getting very Unix-centric in its interfaces, what with file permission
> bits and stuff. This is going to cause problems if and when LLVM is
> ported to other operating systems, though I have to admit it's getting
> difficult to name viable
2005 Dec 05
0
R-devel Digest, Vol 34, Issue 5
actually, I can confirm now that gs AFPL 8.53 is the "culprit" here on #2,
copied below again (though it is not a bug but a feature, albeit one you
need to know about.) the -dSAFER switch, which appears in later versions of
AFPL gs, not only eliminates renamefile and deletefile (manpage), but
seemingly also allows only fonts in the GS_LIB path to be used
export GS_LIB=/usr/local/share/texmf/fonts/type1/yandy:$GS_LIB
fixes this protection problem for me. hope this will help some of you
when you run R pdf files through gs. regards,
/iaw
[2] I do...
2005 Dec 04
1
font inclusions in pdf files
...for some
odd reason, when I include these external lucida fonts, and create graphics
in R, the R-created pdf can no longer be distilled by gs 8.53, because it
stumbles into a safety issue. that is, all the gs scripts named 'ps2pdf*'
have the option -dSAFER on by default, which disables the renamefile and
deletefile operators, and it somehow prevents finding the fonts. (the bug
does not appear if I do not use the external fonts.)
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.postscript/browse_frm/thread/3613c16aec64a9ed/a7c40582a0b5be1b?lnk=st&q=ivowel&rnum=1&hl=en#a7c40582a0b5be1b
r...