Gautam Chakrabarti via llvm-dev
2018-Mar-30 00:08 UTC
[llvm-dev] [debug support] Why do constant SD nodes not set the IROrder?
Updating the subject line. From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Gautam Chakrabarti via llvm-dev Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 11:58 PM To: LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: [llvm-dev] Why do constant SD nodes not set the IROrder? Specifically I would like to understand why ConstantSDNode and ConstantFPSDNode do not set the IR ordering like most other SDNode-s. These constant SD nodes also previously did not set the debugloc, but that got enabled (here: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=237237). These constant SD nodes hard-code the order to 0. Is this intentional, or just something that has not been handled yet? I have a case for debug support where I think this is needed. Thanks, Gautam ________________________________ This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. ________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180330/b0a8eddd/attachment.html>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Why do constant SD nodes not set the IROrder?
- Matching ConstantFPSDNode tablegen
- [LLVMdev] Query Regarding instruction ordering of passive nodes
- Question about identifier name mangling in LLVM manual
- [LLVMdev] [PATCH] Propagate DAG node ordering during legalization and instruction selection