Has LLVM docs deen moved to somewhere recently? The link is broken: http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classllvm_1_1InsertValueInst.html -- Thanks & Regards, Dipanjan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170627/64ae4f89/attachment-0001.html>
Looks like removing the "docs/" and "html/" portions of the URL will get you to the right place now: http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1InsertValueInst.html There was some kind of server move that happened recently; I'm assuming this is a side-effect of that. George On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Dipanjan Das via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> > Has LLVM docs deen moved to somewhere recently? The link is broken: > http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classllvm_1_1InsertValueInst.html > > -- > > Thanks & Regards, > > Dipanjan > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >
Alex Denisov via llvm-dev
2017-Jun-28 02:11 UTC
[llvm-dev] [cfe-users] LLVM docs links broken
Hi Dipanjan, I don’t know what’s the reason is, but it works if you drop ‘html’ from the URL.> On 27. Jun 2017, at 18:40, Dipanjan Das via cfe-users <cfe-users at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > Has LLVM docs deen moved to somewhere recently? The link is broken: http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classllvm_1_1InsertValueInst.html > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > > Dipanjan > _______________________________________________ > cfe-users mailing list > cfe-users at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 496 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170627/679b7ad7/attachment.sig>
On 27 June 2017 at 19:11, George Burgess IV via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> There was some kind of server move that happened recently; I'm > assuming this is a side-effect of that.I'd vaguely understood the old links had been deprecated for a while. Unfortunately they're still the top Google results when you search for the relevant classes, which is really annoying. If anyone knows any active measures we can take to hasten that being fixed, I think we should try. Tim.