Does anyone know what Red Hat/Centos is going with Samba 4? I've looked at their packages in COS 6.5 and 7 and it doesn't make sense. They seems to be doing some kind of watered down or modified version of Samba 4 with some of the tools disabled. Are they still holding off from full AD implementation in their packages because of the MIT Kerberos issues identified in previous discussions? Thanks! -- Greg J. Zartman Board Member for the Koozali SME Server Koozali Foundation, Inc. 2755 19th Street SE Salem, Oregon 97302 Cell: 541-5218449 SME Server user and community member since 2000
On 25/10/14 23:27, Greg Zartman wrote:> Does anyone know what Red Hat/Centos is going with Samba 4? I've looked at > their packages in COS 6.5 and 7 and it doesn't make sense. They seems to > be doing some kind of watered down or modified version of Samba 4 with some > of the tools disabled. > > Are they still holding off from full AD implementation in their packages > because of the MIT Kerberos issues identified in previous discussions? > > Thanks! >YES! Rowland
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Greg Zartman <gzartman at koozali.org> wrote:> Does anyone know what Red Hat/Centos is going with Samba 4? I've looked at > their packages in COS 6.5 and 7 and it doesn't make sense. They seems to > be doing some kind of watered down or modified version of Samba 4 with some > of the tools disabled. > > Are they still holding off from full AD implementation in their packages > because of the MIT Kerberos issues identified in previous discussions? > > Thanks! > > -- > Greg J. Zartman > Board Member for the Koozali SME ServerYou're quite welcome to play with my 4.1.xx RPM building tool kit at https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo and the related repositories there. I don't have a big enough test environment to really test out the AD builds, I just did it as an exercise in "how do I get this into RHEL and Scientific Linux"?
On 10/25/2014 03:27 PM, Greg Zartman wrote:> Does anyone know what Red Hat/Centos is going with Samba 4? I've looked at > their packages in COS 6.5 and 7 and it doesn't make sense. They seems to > be doing some kind of watered down or modified version of Samba 4 with some > of the tools disabled. > > Are they still holding off from full AD implementation in their packages > because of the MIT Kerberos issues identified in previous discussions? > > Thanks! >Redhat has only a client and file server in RHEL 7.0, has they are using MIT kerberos pretty much everywhere they decided that using heimdal would be problematic. I guess this should change, we see lot of moves in order to have MIT kerberos as the kdc for SambaAD. Matthieu. -- Matthieu Patou Samba Team http://samba.org
On Saturday 25 October 2014 15:27:21 Greg Zartman wrote:> Does anyone know what Red Hat/Centos is going with Samba 4? I've looked at > their packages in COS 6.5 and 7 and it doesn't make sense. They seems to > be doing some kind of watered down or modified version of Samba 4 with some > of the tools disabled. > > Are they still holding off from full AD implementation in their packages > because of the MIT Kerberos issues identified in previous discussions?See https://blog.cryptomilk.org/2014/07/09/samba-ad-dc-in-fedora-and-rhel/ -- Andreas Schneider GPG-ID: CC014E3D Samba Team asn at samba.org www.samba.org