Looking at setting up a two node replicated gluster filesystem. Base hard disks on each node are 2*2TB in RAID1. It will be used for serving VM Images. Does the underlying filesystem particularly matter? EXT4? XFS? thanks, -- Lindsay -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20141027/254dd60c/attachment.sig>
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Lindsay Mathieson <lindsay.mathieson at gmail.com> wrote:> Looking at setting up a two node replicated gluster filesystem. Base hard > disks on each node are 2*2TB in RAID1. It will be used for serving VM Images. > > Does the underlying filesystem particularly matter? EXT4? XFS? > > > thanks,Something with xattrs. XFS is most tested/supported.
Hi, XFS is the recommended filesystem by RedHat AFAIK. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message -----> From: "Lindsay Mathieson" <lindsay.mathieson at gmail.com> > To: "gluster-users" <gluster-users at gluster.org> > Sent: Monday, 27 October, 2014 12:52:01 > Subject: [Gluster-users] Recomended underlying filesystem> Looking at setting up a two node replicated gluster filesystem. Base hard > disks on each node are 2*2TB in RAID1. It will be used for serving VM Images. > > Does the underlying filesystem particularly matter? EXT4? XFS? > > > thanks, > > -- > Lindsay > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users