As a user, I am always annoyed beyond measure that Sweave vignettes precede the code by a command line prompt. It makes running examples by simple copying of the commands from the vignette to the console a pain. I know the idea is that it is clear what is the command, and what is the output, but I'd rather precede the output with some kind of marking. Is there any other solution possible / allowed in vignettes? I would much prefer to make my vignettes easier to use for people like me. Kind regards, j. -- -------- January Weiner --------------------------------------
Not sure if this is the right list for your question, but options("prompt"="") should do it. Regards S?ren |-----Original Message----- |From: r-devel-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-devel-bounces at r- |project.org] On Behalf Of January Weiner |Sent: 13. november 2014 12:10 |To: r-devel |Subject: [Rd] Changing style for the Sweave vignettes | |As a user, I am always annoyed beyond measure that Sweave vignettes |precede the code by a command line prompt. It makes running examples by |simple copying of the commands from the vignette to the console a pain. I |know the idea is that it is clear what is the command, and what is the |output, but I'd rather precede the output with some kind of marking. | |Is there any other solution possible / allowed in vignettes? I would much |prefer to make my vignettes easier to use for people like me. | |Kind regards, | |j. | |-- |-------- January Weiner -------------------------------------- | |______________________________________________ |R-devel at r-project.org mailing list |https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
On 11/13/2014 05:09 AM, January Weiner wrote:> As a user, I am always annoyed beyond measure that Sweave vignettes > precede the code by a command line prompt. It makes running examples > by simple copying of the commands from the vignette to the console a > pain. I know the idea is that it is clear what is the command, and > what is the output, but I'd rather precede the output with some kind > of marking. > > Is there any other solution possible / allowed in vignettes? I would > much prefer to make my vignettes easier to use for people like me.I agree with S?ren that this is not the right list, but to complete the thread... See the examples in ?vignette start just above ## Now let us have a closer look at the code All vignette's are compiled. You can trivially extract all the code used for any vignette in R, including any code not displayed in the text and hidden from the user, from within R, or saved out to an editor so you can source it line by line from Rstudio (or vim or emacs or...). That's the whole point. Regards, Brian -- Brian G. Peterson http://braverock.com/brian/ Ph: 773-459-4973 IM: bgpbraverock
On 11/13/2014 03:09 AM, January Weiner wrote:> As a user, I am always annoyed beyond measure that Sweave vignettes > precede the code by a command line prompt. It makes running examples > by simple copying of the commands from the vignette to the console a > pain. I know the idea is that it is clear what is the command, and > what is the output, but I'd rather precede the output with some kind > of marking. > > Is there any other solution possible / allowed in vignettes? I would > much prefer to make my vignettes easier to use for people like me.Vignettes do not need to be generated by Sweave and to pdf documents. My current favorite (e.g., recent course material at http://bioconductor.org/help/course-materials/ which uses styling from the BiocStyle package http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/BiocStyle.html) uses the knitr package (see http://yihui.name/knitr/) to produce HTML vignettes (knitr will also process Rnw files to pdf with perhaps more appealing styling, see, e.g., http://bit.ly/117OLVl for an example of PDF output). The mechanics are discussed in Writing R Extensions (RShowDoc('R-exts')), section 1.4.2 Non-Sweave vignettes. There are three steps involved: specifying a \VignetteEngine in the vignette itself, specifying VignetteBuilder: field in the DESCRIPTION file, and including the package providing the engine (knitr, in my case) in the Suggests: field of the DESCRIPTION file. Brian mentioned processing the vignette to it's underlying code; see ?browseVignettes and ?vignette for installed packages, and ?Stangle in R and R CMD Stangle for extracting the R code from stand-alone vignettes to .R files. Martin Morgan> > Kind regards, > > j. >-- Computational Biology / Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N. PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109 Location: Arnold Building M1 B861 Phone: (206) 667-2793
Maybe Matching Threads
- Sweave provides a misleading error when vignette engine not fully specified
- Creating a vignette which depends on a non-distributable file
- Creating a vignette which depends on a non-distributable file
- R CMD check for the R code from vignettes
- Should a package that indirectly Suggests: a vignette engine pass R CMD check?