Gluster users - Feb 2014 - getfattr in complex deployments

Hi gluster ..........

We've noticed something funny in a 2x2 configuration, which I havent seen
in a 1x2 config.

If there is a 2x1 vs 2x2 brick configuration, can we expect differences in
distribution of getfattr metadata?

Or is getfattr metadata always gauranteed to be available to all servers,
regradless of the replication domain?

-- 
Jay Vyas
http://jayunit100.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20140212/e2bbd848/attachment.html>

Without replication there won't be any trusted.afr attributes.

On February 12, 2014 9:40:17 AM PST, Jay Vyas <jayunit100 at gmail.com>
wrote:
>Hi gluster ..........
>
>We've noticed something funny in a 2x2 configuration, which I havent
>seen
>in a 1x2 config.
>
>If there is a 2x1 vs 2x2 brick configuration, can we expect differences
>in
>distribution of getfattr metadata?
>
>Or is getfattr metadata always gauranteed to be available to all
>servers,
>regradless of the replication domain?
>
>-- 
>Jay Vyas
>http://jayunit100.blogspot.com
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gluster-users mailing list
>Gluster-users at gluster.org
>http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20140212/5fb622b2/attachment.html>