We are planning to have about 100+ parking lots defined in features.conf , each with about 4 unique park positions. Asterisk will be handling all the parking and unparking (we don't exclusively use Park/ParkedCall in the dialplan): [parkinglot_a] parkpos => 1-4 context=parked [parkinglot_b] parkpos => 5-8 context=parked As far as I can tell, Asterisk adds/removes extensions to the parking context(s) dynamically as the calls are parked/unparked. I'm curious which one is preferred (as far as performance and/or stability) - to use one context for all parking lots or to use a separate context for each one? Thanks, Matt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20131023/7ec3e46c/attachment.html>
Mert Yazgart
2013-Oct-24 17:25 UTC
[asterisk-users] unintended bridging on a Cisco SPA phone
My question is not directly related to Asterisk, but I'm hoping users here might have some insight. We have SPA504G phones with only Ext1 enabled. We use the other line keys to pick up parked calls in Asterisk via: fnc=sd+blf;sub=1234 at proxy This works smoothly except for one scenario: When the user presses (by mistake) one of those "unpark" line keys while in an active call with a customer, this active call and the parked call from another customer are bridged (and obviously the call is gone from our phone). Is there a way to force the Cisco phone to put the active call on Hold before getting the parked call? or Is it possible to somewhat temporarily deactivate/disable the unpark line keys while there is an active call? Thanks, Mert -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20131024/13bf760a/attachment.html>