search for: unparked

All; I'm having a problem with parking a call and I'm hoping that someone has seen this problem before. A call comes in and I park it. A few seconds later, I retrieve the call. So far, so good. The problem lies when I go to park the call again, and nothing happens. I'm running Asterisk 11. Any insight at all would be greatly appreciated. Thanks; John V. --------------

...Call is answered, I press the button (on a Cisco SPA504) to park the call, it comes to [from-office] context where the call is parked successfully (there is no parking lot number announcement though). To unpark, I press the same button, it comes to [from-office] context, and the call is picked up/unparked successfully. (I know there is no need to check the device state, since Park will go to the next line if it fails, but this is only for testing.) The problem happens when I try to park the same call to the same parking lot space AGAIN by pressing the same button. This time I hear the announcement,...

...ey3: fnc=blf+sd+cp;sub=701 at 10.0.1.103 Key4: fnc=blf+sd+cp;sub=702 at 10.0.1.103 Parking using these works smoothly. I answer the incoming call, press Key2 to park the call. Call is parked, Key3 turns red showing there is a parked call. If I want to unpark the call, I hit Key3 and the call is unparked. My problem happens when Key3 and Key4 are idle (no parked calls): I answer the incoming call and without first parking the car, I hit one of the idle keys (Key3 or Key4), the phone sends a REFER message, and the incoming call hangs up. I'm trying to find out why the call hangs up and how...

...rking and unparking (we don't exclusively use Park/ParkedCall in the dialplan): [parkinglot_a] parkpos => 1-4 context=parked [parkinglot_b] parkpos => 5-8 context=parked As far as I can tell, Asterisk adds/removes extensions to the parking context(s) dynamically as the calls are parked/unparked. I'm curious which one is preferred (as far as performance and/or stability) - to use one context for all parking lots or to use a separate context for each one? Thanks, Matt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium...

Hi! I build VMKit and run some programs successfully. But when using java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock and java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition, I catch a Throwable : java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: sun.misc.Unsafe.unpark(Ljava/lang/Object;)V after using the function : void java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition.await() My test program is as follows: *import* *java.lang*.*;

Is it possible to park a call through the manager interface? If yes; how? Regards Thorben -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050318/ec2a5f90/attachment.htm

you can do this with MeetMe, but you don't have to. you can also use Parking, which makes things a little simpler. in either case, the strategy is going to be something like: 1. Record the soundfile 2. Park the inbound caller 3. Use a .call file or the manager interface to initiate an outbound call to the mobile phone 4. play soundfile and prompt the mobile phone user to accept/reject the

I've lurked for a while, but I think this is one of my first "pleas" for help. I'm having issues where a parked call using the macro below is getting "stuck". Users park the call via a blfxfer key on an Aastra phone. If the call is a blind transfer, it tries to park the call. If it isn't a blind transfer, it tries to unpark the call. Only 2 extensions (2759 and

Comments? Feature request: Add the ability for the "T" and "t" suffixes in a Dial command to call an extension directly (if specified) instead of going only to the hardcoded "transfer" command. Feature request: Flash events, when presented inside of an existing call, will call a pre-specified extension just like the "T" and "t" request

Ok, this falls under the newbie category: Has anybody created any documentation on using musiconhold or call parking? I have found sample config files for musiconhold, but I'm not sure how they work. [musiconhold.conf] [classes] loud=>mp3:/var/lib/asteriks/mohmp3 How do I then set up this feature in extensions.conf? I can't seem to find an example of what I'm looking for (or I

I've been trying to find a way to connect incoming calls to my cell phone when I'm not in the office. I would like to have asterisk call the cell phone (or any other phone for that matter), and provide me the option to connect to the call. I figure I could park the call, use /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing/ to generate a call to the cell phone and put it into a context somewhere. Now

I would like to build into our application a button to "park" and a button to "unpark" calls. Consider this scenario: Agent A gets a call, and obtains a reference number. He needs to send this client to another Agent. Agent A pushes the "park" button. The call is then parked into a designated slot based on the reference number . Agent A then calls Agent B and

Hi, Is there a way to do a blind transfer within an asterisk dialplan (like '##')? The reason I need this (I think) rather than a regular Goto() is that I'm trying to do one-touch parking. I can park a call using one-touch parking and then pick it up again, however if I try to re-park the call, it gets lost. I think that is because asterisk thinks I'm still on the park extension.

Since www.bkw.org seems not to exist anymore (getting response from some hosting provider), does anyone happend to have a copy of app_valetparking.c from www.bkw.org - the one that should work with * stable 1.0.X ? If so please contact me. One that can be downloaded from www.loligo.com dosn't compile with 1.0.X, and SuperValletParking (www.asterlink.com/svp/) seems to be for * HEAD

Nope ! This is the one that tries to include PRE 1.0.X header file <parking.h>. It cannot compile on * 1.0.X (I have tried also to include <features.h> instead of <parking.h> (as far as I know features.h is successor to parking.h), but still without results). Thanks anyway. Nenad > > Try this > >> Since www.bkw.org seems not to exist anymore (getting

Hi LLVM developers, I have successfully installed LLVM 2.9 on an ubuntu linux box, with a LLVM-based frontend support of gcc and g++. After installing successfully vmkit I have tried running my java applications, but it failed. I have installed the latest stable release of vmkit (0.29) using the introduction text of the LLVM website. The application does consist of two programs. The first