Viechtbauer Wolfgang (STAT)
2013-Sep-15 20:13 UTC
[Rd] FOSS licence with BuildVignettes: false
Dear All, I have been checking the metafor package against R-devel. R CMD check --as-cran metafor yields one note: FOSS licence with BuildVignettes: false Yes, I have 'BuildVignettes: FALSE' in my DESCRIPTION file. I see at http://developer.r-project.org/blosxom.cgi/R-devel/NEWS: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 CHANGES IN R-devel UTILITIES 'R CMD check --as-cran' warns about a false value of the 'DESCRIPTION' field 'BuildVignettes' for Open Source packages, and ignores it (as an Open Source package needs to have complete sources for its vignettes). My questions are: 1) Is this going to be an issue if I submit a new version of the metafor package to CRAN right now? 2) And if the answer to 1 is "Not right now": Is this going to become an issue in the future? In other words, is it the goal to only allow packages with BuildVignettes=true if they have an FOSS license at some point in the future? Best, Wolfgang -- Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Ph.D., Statistician Department of Psychiatry and Psychology School for Mental Health and Neuroscience Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616 (VIJV1) 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands +31 (43) 388-4170 | http://www.wvbauer.com
Setting BuildVignettes: false is fine if it is possible to build the vignettes, and the latter is checked in CRAN incoming checks (but not the daily checks). Uwe Ligges On 15.09.2013 22:13, Viechtbauer Wolfgang (STAT) wrote:> Dear All, > > I have been checking the metafor package against R-devel. > > R CMD check --as-cran metafor > > yields one note: > > FOSS licence with BuildVignettes: false > > Yes, I have 'BuildVignettes: FALSE' in my DESCRIPTION file. I see at http://developer.r-project.org/blosxom.cgi/R-devel/NEWS: > > Tue, 25 Jun 2013 > CHANGES IN R-devel UTILITIES > > 'R CMD check --as-cran' warns about a false value of the 'DESCRIPTION' field 'BuildVignettes' for Open Source packages, and ignores it (as an Open Source package needs to have complete sources for its vignettes). > > My questions are: > > 1) Is this going to be an issue if I submit a new version of the metafor package to CRAN right now? > > 2) And if the answer to 1 is "Not right now": Is this going to become an issue in the future? In other words, is it the goal to only allow packages with BuildVignettes=true if they have an FOSS license at some point in the future? > > Best, > Wolfgang > > -- > Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Ph.D., Statistician > Department of Psychiatry and Psychology > School for Mental Health and Neuroscience > Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences > Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616 (VIJV1) > 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands > +31 (43) 388-4170 | http://www.wvbauer.com > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >
Maybe Matching Threads
- "metafor" package, proportions: single groups wrt to a categorical dependent variableā
- refline in forest() {metafor}
- Broken Links on http://www.r-project.org
- What to use for ti in back-transforming summary statistics from F-T double square-root transformation in 'metafor'
- Error when adding lines to a plot using the mixed-effect model and metafor package