thr3ads.net - Rails - 0 errors with ''autotest'' BUT 30 errors with ''rake test:units'' [Jan 2007]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Alain Ravet

2007-Jan-26 22:37 UTC

0 errors with ''autotest'' BUT 30 errors with ''rake test:units''

Hi group,

My test suites don''t behave by the book. I''ve been scratching
my head
for hours in vain. I hope you can help me solve this mystery.


1/ With autotest, and
2/ when run manually, class by class

   they all pass

BUT

3/ With ''rake test:units'' + transactional fixture => 25
errors
4/ With ''rake test:units''  withouth transactional fixture
=> 33 errors (not 25)

   	130 tests, 232 assertions, 3 failures, 25 errors
and
	130 tests, 220 assertions, 4 failures, 33 errors


AND
IN BOTH CASEs  (autotest + rake)

5/ tables/models are not empty when they should (in the setup
methods), even when I use no fixtures.

   ==> this setup code fails

    def setup
        assert_equal 0, Production.count
    end

6/ I get 2 dozens warnings like:
     ./test/unit/lib/grid_calendar/../../../test_helper.rb:101:
warning: already initialized constant CANT_BE_BLANK


Any idea?  I''m lost.


  - I use Edge Rails + simply_bdd (and a dozen other plugins)
  - All the tables are InnoDB (transactional), and I work with MySql4
+ Locomotive).
  - I can''t tell when this started happening, as I''ve been
using
autotest for weeks.

TIA

Alain

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Phlip

2007-Jan-26 22:48 UTC

head link

Re: 0 errors with ''autotest'' BUT 30 errors with ''rake test:units''

Alain Ravet wrote:
> My test suites don''t behave by the book. I''ve been
scratching my head
> for hours in vain. I hope you can help me solve this mystery.
You don''t have isolated test cases. Data from one test case is most
likely leaking into the next one.
> 1/ With autotest, and
> 2/ when run manually, class by class
What''s rake test:recent do?

What''s ruby/test/functional/some_controller_test.rb do?

When you get that far, use -n test_my_favorite_test to run them one at a time.
>   they all pass
>
> BUT
>
> 3/ With ''rake test:units'' + transactional fixture =>
25 errors
> 4/ With ''rake test:units''  withouth transactional fixture
=> 33 errors (not 25)
The unit tests might depend on the data left over from the functional
tests in the last run. Try rake test:functional test:units
> 5/ tables/models are not empty when they should (in the setup
> methods), even when I use no fixtures.
When you use no fixtures, nothing erases the existing data. Use
fixtures, and/or write setup code that zilches everything you don''t
want to be there.
>   ==> this setup code fails
>
>    def setup
>        assert_equal 0, Production.count
>    end
> 6/ I get 2 dozens warnings like:
>     ./test/unit/lib/grid_calendar/../../../test_helper.rb:101:
> warning: already initialized constant CANT_BE_BLANK
That''s different. Autotest runs each test run within its own, single,
Ruby context. This is a bad design decision (again due to test
isolation concerns), and it should shell to a Ruby with a line like
system("rake test:recent"). But that''s an internal affair for
Autotest, and I know what will happen if I try to discuss ZenTest with
its authors...

I think you can put unless defined? CANT_BE_BLANK after those lines...
>  - I can''t tell when this started happening, as I''ve been
using
> autotest for weeks.
Oops. Always run the Grand-Wazoo Test before commits, and always use
test:recent after edits in several areas to make sure their tests can
mix-and-match.

Read this; it has a link back to a simpler (stoopider) autotester that
shells to ruby instead of keeps one in memory:

http://phlip.eblogs.com/growl-driven-development

-- 
  Phlip
  http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?ZeekLand  <-- NOT a blog!!

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Alain Ravet

2007-Jan-27 20:43 UTC

head link

Re: 0 errors with ''autotest'' BUT 30 errors with ''rake test:units''

[Solved] or rather [Worked around] (but 2 mysteries remain)


   > What''s rake test:recent do?

Bingo: that''s the sleuthing tool I needed



Debriefing :
===========
So, the problem was:
some code
  - was working fine in the  application
  - was working fine in tests when run by ''autotest''
  - was working fine in tests when run by ''ruby
test/units/....rb''
, but
  - was failing in tests when run through ''rake test''

Thanks to
    "rake test:recent "
and touching (saving) test classes 1 by 1, I was able to single-out
the problematic code:

  class Genre < ActiveRecord::Base
    ..
    MUSIC    = find_by_name(''music'')   <<< ---- RAKED
TESTS DON''T LIKE
THIS (all they get is a nil)
    ..
  end

Mystery 1:
==========for some reason, AR-based constants work fine, except when run through
rake tests. Why on earth ??


Mystery 2:
==========
   >  When you use no fixtures, nothing erases the existing data. Use
   >  fixtures, and/or write setup code that zilches everything you
don''t
   > want to be there.

Shouldn''t any table changes done in the setups and tests be rollbacked
after each tests?


Even though I use
    self.use_transactional_fixtures = true

, and purge the tables before launching the test
   rake db:test:purge
   rake test:units

this test fails:

  def setup
  end
  def test_setup
      assert_equal 0, Production.count   <<------- TABLE IS NOT EMPTY
  end

I still don''t understand this.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Rails - Jan 2007 - 0 errors with 'autotest' BUT 30 errors with 'rake test:units'

0 errors with ''autotest'' BUT 30 errors with ''rake test:units''

Re: 0 errors with ''autotest'' BUT 30 errors with ''rake test:units''

Re: 0 errors with ''autotest'' BUT 30 errors with ''rake test:units''