thr3ads.net - Rails - form_remote_for can do :put [Jan 2007]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Adam Madd

2007-Jan-23 15:37 UTC

form_remote_for can do :put

Hello all,

Im tryng to create a remote_form_for in a restful app, but cant get the
method to be put. It appears to default to post if the value is not post
or get.

is there a trick to this or does form_for_remote not have non get/post
methods.

i tried to add the hidden field forcably but wasnt sure on the syntax. i
know i need this output.
<input type="hidden" value="put"
name="_method"/>



for the following :method values i get these when inspecting the
rendered page:

rhtml>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Rendered HTML
:method => ''put''>>>>>>>>>>   
method="post"
:method => ''sfsdfsdf''>>>>>   
method="post"
:method =>
''get''>>>>>>>>>>>  
method="get"

form_remote_for usage:
<pre>

<% form_remote_for(
:track,
track,
:url => track_path(track_edit),
:html => { :method => ''put''}) do |f| %>

form stuff here

<%= image_submit_tag ''icons/arrow_refresh'' %>

<% end %>
</pre>

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

mcintyre.tim-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org

2007-Jan-23 18:23 UTC

head link

Re: form_remote_for can do :put

I''ve just been doing stuff like this:

<% form_remote_for(:track,
                               :url => track_path(:id => track.id),
                               :method => "PUT") do |f| %>

been working fine for me:-)
Tim


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Adam Madd

2007-Jan-23 22:23 UTC

head link

Re: form_remote_for can do :put

unknown wrote:> I''ve just been doing stuff like this:
> 
> <% form_remote_for(:track,
>                                :url => track_path(:id => track.id),
>                                :method => "PUT") do |f| %>
> 
> been working fine for me:-)
> Tim

hey tim thanks for the reply.

Really? Yours works. Hmmmm.

I was under the impression that the :id assignment was implied through 
order. In this case there is no nesting so i figured track was assigned 
to id.

Im begging to think that the fact that i have the form nested in a row 
of a table, im getting errors there. I checked and there is a list of 
_method put hidden fields further up..

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

mcintyre.tim-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org

2007-Jan-24 04:57 UTC

head link

Re: form_remote_for can do :put

On Jan 23, 2:23 pm, Adam Madd
<rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>
wrote:> unknown wrote:
> > I''ve just been doing stuff like this:
>
> > <% form_remote_for(:track,
> >                                :url => track_path(:id =>
track.id),
> >                                :method => "PUT") do |f|
%>
>
> > been working fine for me:-)
> > Timhey tim thanks for the reply.
>
> Really? Yours works. Hmmmm.
Yep, I''m using that syntax in a good number of places.  It does the
HTTP PUT and everything works fine.
>
> I was under the impression that the :id assignment was implied through
> order. In this case there is no nesting so i figured track was assigned
> to id.
Sorry I''m not completely following you here, however you definitely
need to pass the :id to singular_word_path() when you want to do a an
update (e.g. HTTP PUT).
>
> Im begging to think that the fact that i have the form nested in a row
> of a table, im getting errors there. I checked and there is a list of
> _method put hidden fields further up..
I haven''t tried to do anything with hidden fields in this regaurd but I
suspect it''s throwing you off track, not really sure.

good luck
Tim
> 
> --
> Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Adam Madd

2007-Jan-24 09:28 UTC

head link

Re: form_remote_for can do :put

unknown wrote:> On Jan 23, 2:23 pm, Adam Madd
<rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Really? Yours works. Hmmmm.
> Yep, I''m using that syntax in a good number of places.  It does
the
> HTTP PUT and everything works fine.
> 
>>
>> I was under the impression that the :id assignment was implied through
>> order. In this case there is no nesting so i figured track was assigned
>> to id.
> 
> Sorry I''m not completely following you here, however you
definitely
> need to pass the :id to singular_word_path() when you want to do a an
> update (e.g. HTTP PUT).
> 
>>
>> Im begging to think that the fact that i have the form nested in a row
>> of a table, im getting errors there. I checked and there is a list of
>> _method put hidden fields further up..
> 
> I haven''t tried to do anything with hidden fields in this regaurd
but I
> suspect it''s throwing you off track, not really sure.
> 
> good luck
> Tim
Thanks again for your help.

The hidden fields were added automatically from the form_remote_for when 
i specified put as the method.

I have started down a in_place_edit path at the moment which is proving 
equally difficult under rest. I will try the remote_form_for again.



Adam




-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Ed Hickey

2007-Jan-24 16:12 UTC

head link

Re: form_remote_for can do :put

On 1/23/07, Adam Madd
<rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>
wrote:>
>
> unknown wrote:
> > I''ve just been doing stuff like this:
> >
> > <% form_remote_for(:track,
> >                                :url => track_path(:id =>
track.id),
> >                                :method => "PUT") do |f|
%>
> >
> > been working fine for me:-)
> > Tim

I can''t get that to work for me.  I ''ve been using the :html
hash for
passing the PUT method as a hidden field.  I''ve found this method in
the
Beast forum and it seems to work.  Though, it does seem like you should be
able to pass the :method param and have it override POST.

Anyone else have experience with this?

Ed

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Mathew Sanders

2009-Feb-01 04:24 UTC

head link

Re: form_remote_for can do :put

Ed Hickey wrote:> On 1/23/07, Adam Madd
<rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> > Tim
> I can''t get that to work for me.  I ''ve been using the
:html hash for
> passing the PUT method as a hidden field.  I''ve found this method
in the
> Beast forum and it seems to work.  Though, it does seem like you should 
> be
> able to pass the :method param and have it override POST.
> 
> Anyone else have experience with this?
> 
> Ed
I was having a similar problem and in the end it was because 
prototype.js wasn''t loading and it was sending the form request as GET 
instead of POST (or pseudo PUT depends on how you want to think about 
it)

in my .htaccess I added this rule

   RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/javascripts.*
   RewriteRule .* - [L]

Which allowed prototype.js to load and it worked.

Hope this helps someone!
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Rails - Jan 2007 - form_remote_for can do :put

form_remote_for can do :put

Re: form_remote_for can do :put

Re: form_remote_for can do :put

Re: form_remote_for can do :put

Re: form_remote_for can do :put

Re: form_remote_for can do :put

Re: form_remote_for can do :put