Zed,
I must have missed this one in my original searches on the mailing list.
Although I agree with you that WSRP is somewhat brain damaged, I think that this
is one way that Rails can make in roads into the corporate environment. As Erin
points out there are some big dollar Portal server investments that corporation
are not going to let go of.
Ron
________________________________
From: zedshaw@zedshaw.com [mailto:zedshaw@zedshaw.com]
Sent: Wed 10/12/2005 6:11 PM
To: rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
Subject: Re: [Rails] WSRP
I''ve actually contemplated doing one better (since I hate WSRP): Once
my
SCGI stuff is working right I want to create an "SCGI Proxy Portlet"
which
will just talk SCGI directly to the Rails application and put it through
the portal. No promises yet, but I really think this is the best way to
put Rails through a portal (or similar app framework).
Zed A. Shaw
http://www.zedshaw.com/
> Has anyone thought about, talked about or actually worked on a WSRP
> implementation in Rails?
>
> It would be an interesting in-road into corporate development. Rather
> than hosting portlets in 20K/cpu portal servers, you could serve them up
> out of Rails and pull them into a portal server through WSRP. (It seems
> like a lot of portal deployments are going the WSRP route anyway.)
>
> Cheers,
> Erin
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>
_______________________________________________
Rails mailing list
Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails