Hello, Apologies if I''m posting in the wrong place - I wasn''t sure how else to inform whoever is able to update api.rubyonrails.org. Seems like it hasn''t been updated for 2.1 yet? Jeff --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Jeff <cohen.jeff@gmail.com> wrote:> Apologies if I''m posting in the wrong place - I wasn''t sure how else > to inform whoever is able to update api.rubyonrails.org. Seems like > it hasn''t been updated for 2.1 yet?I don''t know what happens, but in the meantime, the docs generated straight from docrails are available here: http://docs.rails.info/ Take into account docrails documents edge, though. I''d love to see the official API updated, there''s a good amount of work waiting to see the light. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
http://www.railsbrain.com has the 2.1 docs. It''s pretty nice. Regards, Craig --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Here''s the ticket: http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/357 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Chris Kampmeier <ChrisGKampmeier@gmail.com> wrote:> Here''s the ticket: http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/357I generated and uploaded the current 2.1 docs. Best, jeremy --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net> wrote:> I generated and uploaded the current 2.1 docs.Great! named_scope does not appear in the frame with methods, but it has rdoc and no #:nodoc:. Isn''t that suspicious? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:> > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net> wrote: > >> I generated and uploaded the current 2.1 docs. > > Great! > > named_scope does not appear in the frame with methods, but it has rdoc > and no #:nodoc:. Isn''t that suspicious?Hmm. I see it in that frame. jeremy --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net> wrote:>> named_scope does not appear in the frame with methods, but it has rdoc >> and no #:nodoc:. Isn''t that suspicious? > > Hmm. I see it in that frame.Yes, me too now. Good! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---