On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Eric Sorenson
<eric.sorenson@puppetlabs.com> wrote:
> There is an open question about whether it''s safe to append a
suffix of
> ''.service'' to the service name for systemd -- Can someone
with deep
> knowledge of systemd please chime in on the ticket?
Don''t have an account there. But something ending in .service is but
one example of a systemd unit. All have similar properties (in that
they can be started, stopped, have status, etc). For the service type
in puppet, it would be 99.9% safe to just append .service in the
systemd provider and be done with it. But perhaps people would want to
manage other types of units with puppet - for which a new type could
be written, but given that they share so much with "services", it
makes sense to just overload that, IMO - so I guess the answer is that
there''s pros and cons to both approaches :)
$0.02
-Jon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.