Hi All, Trying to run fsck on a local linux raid partition gave the following. [root at ... /]# fsck.ext4 /dev/md0 e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010) /dev/md0 has unsupported feature(s): 64bit e2fsck: Get a newer version of e2fsck! Odd as the server is 64bit running latest kernel and using latest "e2fsprogs.x86_64". Any ideas awould be much appreciated. Cheers Steve k
Try this out to find out who complains the arch, strace fsck.ext4 /dev/md5. Post the output here that we can check more if it's from the app or the kernel. ------------ Banyan He Blog: http://www.rootong.com Email: banyan at rootong.com On 2012-10-25 5:10 PM, Steve Brooks wrote:> Hi All, > > Trying to run fsck on a local linux raid partition gave the following. > > > [root at ... /]# fsck.ext4 /dev/md0 > e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010) > /dev/md0 has unsupported feature(s): 64bit > e2fsck: Get a newer version of e2fsck! > > Odd as the server is 64bit running latest kernel and using > latest "e2fsprogs.x86_64". > > Any ideas awould be much appreciated. > > Cheers Steve > k > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >
I think it comes out from the app itself for the verification. The
question is if the soft raid supports by anyhow. Trying to build one
test box for it.
print_unsupp_features:
if (features[0] || features[1] || features[2]) {
int i, j;
__u32 *mask = features, m;
fprintf(stderr, _("%s has unsupported feature(s):"),
ctx->filesystem_name);
for (i=0; i <3; i++,mask++) {
for (j=0,m=1; j < 32; j++, m<<=1) {
if (*mask & m)
fprintf(stderr, " %s",
e2p_feature2string(i, m));
}
}
putc('\n', stderr);
goto get_newer;
}
------------
Banyan He
Blog: http://www.rootong.com
Email: banyan at rootong.com
On 2012-10-25 5:10 PM, Steve Brooks wrote:> Hi All,
>
> Trying to run fsck on a local linux raid partition gave the following.
>
>
> [root at ... /]# fsck.ext4 /dev/md0
> e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
> /dev/md0 has unsupported feature(s): 64bit
> e2fsck: Get a newer version of e2fsck!
>
> Odd as the server is 64bit running latest kernel and using
> latest "e2fsprogs.x86_64".
>
> Any ideas awould be much appreciated.
>
> Cheers Steve
> k
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>