search for: fsck

Hi there, I am newbie and recently started using btrfs. Now facing a weird problem. FWIW, I am on archlinux, kenel v3.8.0, having Btrfs v0.20-rc1. After an abnormal reboot, getting these errors while boot: systemd.fsck[289]: checking extents systemd.fsck[289]: checking fs roots systemd.fsck[289]: checking root refs systemd.fsck[289]: found 23728128 bytes used err is 0 systemd.fsck[289]: total csum bytes: 23092 systemd.fsck[289]: total tree bytes: 81920 systemd.fsck[289]: total fs tree bytes: 24576 systemd.fsck[28...

Hi, I thought that I would attempt a quick little patch that will make btrfsck into a No-op when called as fsck.btrfsck. The reasoning is that the FAQ states that it is recommended and safe to do so, and the current 12.04 version of Ubuntu just symlinks fsck.btrfsck to btrfsck instead of /bin/true. PS - Apologies if I mess this git send-email up! Dan McGrath (1): btrfs...

Hi there, I am very new in linux and met the filesystem problem as described in the following, I tried to use 'fsck' and tried to find some support documents but failed. Your hints and helps are very appreciated. Millions of thanks, Annie The error message is (sorry for it's length, I just want to make it clear) ==================================================================== checking root filesy...

Something seems to be wrong with my file systems, and I want to fsck everything. But I cannot. The setup consists of 2 hds, carrying 3 raid1 (ext3) file systems (boot, /, swap). OS is up-to-date CentOS 5. So I boot from CentOS 5.3 dvd in rescue mode, do not mount the file systems, and try to run fsck -y /dev/md0 fsck -y /dev/md1 fsck -y /dev/md2 For each tr...

Thanks for a great file system! I have a two-node cluster working as a HA NFS server. This system has worked fine for almost a year, but recently I found that an ocfs2 file system had been corrupted and needed to be repaired with fsck.ocfs2. Even though I don't think that any data was lost I found that 4 of my 14 ocfs2 partitions had some errors which were corrected by fsck.ocfs2. I then realized that these errors probably had been there since a rather long time ago when an UPS broke down. I also found that on my system fsc...

...: > On Sep 19, 2014, at 7:56 PM, jd1008 <jd1008@gmail.com> wrote: >> I am reporting this on the advice of the Fedora Users Mailing List Member. >> >> This the mailing list exchange outlining the problem with specifying -S to mkfs, and it's subsequent consequences when fsck is run. >> >> I am reporting this per suggestions made to me on the Fedora Users Mailing List. > I would say that "mke2fs -S" is going to lead to worse corruption rather > than improving the situation in 999 times of 1000. It should only be > used by someone who know...

Greetings! Need your help fellow penguins! Strange behavior with fsck.ext3: how to remove a long orphaned inode list? After copying data over from one old RAID to another new RAID with rsync, the dump command would not complete because of filesystem errors on the new RAID. So I ran fsck.ext3 with the -y option and it would just run in an infinite loop restarting its...

...BELOW): "XT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)): ext3_new_block: Allocating block in system zone - block = 294914" Then I rebooted (because I wanted to boot in runlevel 3 to see whether I could play sound..., not relevant here). Error bootmessages appeared (SEE BELOW FOR MORE DETAILS): "fsck: /dev/hda2 contains a file system with errors, check forced"... fsck: /dev/hda2: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. failed to check filesytem. Do you want to repair the errors? Y/N (beware, you can lose data) I pressed Yes: a lot of inodes were fixed or cleared ABOUT 22345 MESSAGES...

...6, missing codepage or other error In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try dmesg | tail or so The partition /dev/sda6 is an ext3 file system. It also tried to specify the file system type with -text3 and to use a backup superblock with the sb option but it does not help. I tried to run fsck but it does not fix the problem either. Here is the output of fsck: # fsck.ext3 /dev/sda6 e2fsck 1.39 (29-May-2006) Group descriptors look bad... trying backup blocks... Inode bitmap for group 522 is not in group. (block 3271884801) Relocate<y>? yes fsck.ext3: e2fsck_read_bitmaps: illegal b...

Robin, To me, anyone else includes the kernel of the current node. Well, if it is unclear the man page should be revised. Also a big warning message on ocfs2.fsck would be nice, after all we all make mistakes. But this is only my two cents. Running fsck on any journaled filesystem will replay the journal. This will cause corruption if the filesystem is mounted read/write, even if the filesystem was not corrupted on the first place. You could mount i...

Dear All My CentOS server got file system inconsistency , asking for "type Ctrl-D for normal boot or give root password for maintenance to run fsck manually". I tried for manually run fsck , as the followings : #fsck -s /dev/hda3 But after rebooting the server it will come back again at the similar prompt asking for "give root password for maintenance" . Can you please do me favor and let me know how can I try for advanced fsck...

On Sep 19, 2014, at 7:56 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > I am reporting this on the advice of the Fedora Users Mailing List Member. > > This the mailing list exchange outlining the problem with specifying -S to mkfs, and it's subsequent consequences when fsck is run. > > I am reporting this per suggestions made to me on the Fedora Users Mailing List. I would say that "mke2fs -S" is going to lead to worse corruption rather than improving the situation in 999 times of 1000. It should only be used by someone who knows very specific detai...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, simple question: how can I execute a "fsck.ocfs2 /dev/sdf"? All I get is - ---snip--- myhost:~ # fsck.ocfs2 /dev/sdf fsck.ocfs2 1.4.3 Checking OCFS2 filesystem in /dev/sdf: Label: SAP01 UUID: 5969C8CABB854F8EA9C17B5B8DE48EC6 Number of blocks: 183500800 Block size: 4096 Number of clusters...

I am reporting this on the advice of the Fedora Users Mailing List Member. This the mailing list exchange outlining the problem with specifying -S to mkfs, and it's subsequent consequences when fsck is run. I am reporting this per suggestions made to me on the Fedora Users Mailing List. The following is the mailing list exchange: On 09/18/2014 07:01 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 09/18/2014 12:37 PM, jd1008 wrote: >> Is there any other tool that can extract files from a partitio...

Hi, We've got some units in client's vehicles which are running Fedora core 1. We've can log into them over ssh remotely there is no console attached to them. I suspect one of them has some filesystem corruption, and I'd like to both force a fsck at next reboot (which I think I can do with shutdown -F) but I'd also like to make this fsck not require any human intervention. In particular, I am concerned about the case where fsck decides that it need manual intervention and requests you log in for maintainance. How can I ensure a non-u...

...of 427245568 inodes. This is using Scientific Linux 4.4 (a RHEL clone). The filesystem consists of multiple backups created with rsync using --link-dest, which hard links files which haven't been modified to the previous copy. There are several hundred days worth of these backups. I decided to fsck the file system, but unfortunately fsck is extremely slow. It has been going now for 67 hours and appears to be completely cpu bound (no obvious disk access) and stuck at the "Pass 2: Checking directory structure" stage. It doesn't respond to a normal kill or ctrl+c. Does anybody kno...

...:25:16 EDT 2002 i686 unknown This problem occured after upgrade to kernel 2.4.18-17.7, backed out to previous version now (2.4.9-34). All other system RPMs are up to date according to RHN, and nothing, aside from Apache/PHP, is compiled from sources. The problem: ------------ [root@angel root]# fsck -V -t ext3 /dev/hdg1 fsck 1.26 (3-Feb-2002) [/sbin/fsck.ext3 (1) -- /dev/hdg1] fsck.ext3 /dev/hdg1 e2fsck 1.26 (3-Feb-2002) Warning... fsck.ext3 for device /dev/hdg1 exited with signal 11. [root@angel root]# fsck.ext3 -V e2fsck 1.26 (3-Feb-2002) Using EXT2FS Library version 1.26, 3-Feb-20...

On 2013-08-29, at 7:48 PM, Richards, Paul Franklin wrote: > Strange behavior with fsck.ext3: how to remove a long orphaned inode list? > > After copying data over from one old RAID to another new RAID with rsync, the dump command would not complete because of filesystem errors on the new RAID. So I ran fsck.ext3 with the -y option and it would just run in an infinite loop rest...

Hi Guys, I have a xen set up with two domu VM''s. One of these VM has recently crashed and was running lot of web services. When I tried to xm shutdown and xm create -c domainname, it directly starts fsck and ends up with the following: INIT: version 2.86 booting Starting the hotplug events dispatcher: udevd[    2.724077] udevd version 125 started . Synthesizing the initial hotplug events...done. Waiting for /dev to be fully populated...done. Setting the system clock. Unable to set System Clock to:...

Hello Everyone, I just ran fsck.ocfs2 on /dev/drbd0 which is a one gig partition on a vm with limited resource (100meg of ram). I am worried that the process crashed because it has not responded in the past hour or so? fsck.ocfs2 /dev/drbd0 fsck.ocfs2 1.6.4 [RECOVER_CLUSTER_INFO] The running cluster is using the cman stack with...