klibc - May 2012 - [sh4] klibc SIGILL

Hi sh4 porters,

I?ve just fixed a regression of klibc to build from source
on sh4 using the sumotsu.debian.net porterbox (thanks for
making one available) and found a problem with your archi-
tecture: all binaries built with klibc (shared and static)
get a SIGILL (illegal instruction).

I suspect that different CFLAGS are needed. Please, someone,
have a look at it; a release of klibc 2.0 upstream is
imminent.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much
*much* more bare bones. But it turns out it beats the living hell out of
ksh93 in that respect. I'd even consider it for my daily use if I hadn't
wasted half my life on my zsh setup. :-) -- Frank Terbeck in #!/bin/mksh

Hi,

Thank you for making it notice.
I will check about this.

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro

2012/5/19 Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd.de>:
> Hi sh4 porters,
>
> I?ve just fixed a regression of klibc to build from source
> on sh4 using the sumotsu.debian.net porterbox (thanks for
> making one available) and found a problem with your archi-
> tecture: all binaries built with klibc (shared and static)
> get a SIGILL (illegal instruction).
>
> I suspect that different CFLAGS are needed. Please, someone,
> have a look at it; a release of klibc 2.0 upstream is
> imminent.
>
> bye,
> //mirabilos
> --
> FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was
much
> *much* more bare bones. But it turns out it beats the living hell out of
> ksh93 in that respect. I'd even consider it for my daily use if I
hadn't
> wasted half my life on my zsh setup. :-) -- Frank Terbeck in #!/bin/mksh
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-superh-REQUEST at lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster at
lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/Pine.BSM.4.64L.1205181641040.23784 at
herc.mirbsd.org
>


-- 
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
?? iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
?? GPG ID: 40AD1FA6