Dear All I am preparing a number of vignettes that require a very long time to process with Sweave. The longest one takes 10 hours. I love the weaver package! Is a package that includes such a computationally intensive vignette acceptable on CRAN? Are there any guidelines here? -- Robin K. S. Hankin Uncertainty Analyst University of Cambridge 19 Silver Street Cambridge CB3 9EP 01223-764877
Robin Hankin wrote:> Dear All > > I am preparing a number of vignettes that require a very long time to > process with Sweave. The longest one takes 10 hours. I love the weaver > package! > > Is a package that includes such a computationally intensive vignette > acceptable on CRAN? Are there any guidelines here?Robin, please try to keep a package below 5 minutes check time. You know, it's hard to perform daily checks for 1700 packages if just one already runs for 10 hours. In reasonable circumstances, we do have exclude lists, but it probably does not make sense to provide that computational intensive vignettes. Perhaps you can provide some intermediate results in form of Rdata files in order to reduce runtime of your vignette's creation (and checks!). Best wishes, Uwe
G'day Robin, On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:10:45 +0000 Robin Hankin <rksh1 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:> I am preparing a number of vignettes that require a very long time to > process with Sweave. The longest one takes 10 hours.Is the sum of all chunks taking this time? Or is it mostly the code in only a view chunks? And if so, are there chunks following that depend on the result of these time-intensive chunks? I wonder if it is feasible to construct your vignette according to the lines. 1) have a file, say, vignette1.Rnw.in that contains: -------------------- #ifdef BUILDVERSION you may want to try the commands \begin{Sinput}> command1 > command2\end{Sinput} but be aware that his might take a long time. #else Now we run the commands <<>>command1 command2 @ #endif -------------------------- 2) Now construct a Makefile that, using a preprocesser like cpp, produces vignette1.Rnw from vignette1.Rnw.in using the first version before an "R CMD build" but otherwise (for your own testing) the second version. Using .Rbuildignore, you can ensure that vignett1.Rnw.in would not be distributed.> I love the weaver package!Thanks for pointing this package out. I was aware of cacheSweave, but that package seems to require that each chunk has a label which I find kind of inconvenient. weaver does not seem to have such a requirement. Cheers, Berwin
Reasonably Related Threads
- shell script question
- Can't seem to setup remote access to doveadmI'm using
- creating a mailbox via imap
- samba4 gpo update problem
- Why are the arguments supplied for the command run through ssh interpreted by shell before they are passed to the command on the server side?