-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, I've uploaded the *final* 3.0.23c roll up patch to http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/patch-3.0.23b-3.0.23c-gwc-2.diffs.gz. I've already cut the 3.0.23c tarballs so unless there is a major problem, this will be the final change set. Please report *any* bugs that you find. I'd like to wrap this one up and do the public 3.0.23c release on Friday. cheers, jerry ====================================================================Samba ------- http://www.samba.org Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com "What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE9dsfIR7qMdg1EfYRAha2AKCngC4YgJ9zLj0S8nTmU193lNWe1wCgmDK4 gM8YRMtJ/KzdLzlUk2Pjcfk=Ggf7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:> I've uploaded the *final* 3.0.23c roll up patch to > http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/patch-3.0.23b-3.0.23c-gwc-2.diffs.gz. > I've already cut the 3.0.23c tarballs so unless there is > a major problem, this will be the final change set. > > Please report *any* bugs that you find.Well, I'm not positive it's a bug, but with 3.0.23b, I can go to the (Windows Explorer context menu) "Properties"->"Security" dialog and look at the list of "Group or user names", and every file I've tried shows the group's SID before the user's SID. This isn't the order I expect, and in fact, it's different from what I see on 3.0.10 system which runs against the same ldapsam data. With 3.0.10, I get what I expect: Group or user names: +-----------------------------------+ | (H) Logan Shaw (MYDOMAIN\lshaw) | | (HH) engineer (MYDOMAIN\engineer) | | (HH) Everyone | +-----------------------------------+ (The "(H)" represents the single-human-head icon, meaning user, and the "(HH)" represents the two-human-heads icon, meaning group, I guess.) With the 3.0.23b, I get something like this instead: Group or user names: +-----------------------------------+ | (HH) engineer (MYDOMAIN\engineer) | | (HH) Everyone | | (H) Logan Shaw (MYDOMAIN\lshaw) | +-----------------------------------+ Note that the user appears at the bottom of the list. I think this is probably related to something else I'm seeing: when an Excel or Word file is open and locked by a user and someone else tries to open it, they get a message that it's locked by "engineer" (the group) rather than "lshaw" (the username). So, what relevance does this have to 3.0.23c? Well, it's happening with 3.0.23b, and I spent about 15 minutes looking through the 3.0.23b->3.0.23c patch you just posted today (patch-3.0.23b-3.0.23c-gwc-2.diffs.gz), and I couldn't see any code changes that looked related. Unfortunately, I can't really take the server down to test the patched version for real. Also, I'm fairly sure it didn't happen with 3.0.22 and that I haven't changed smb.conf in any meaningful way since moving from 3.0.22 to 3.0.23b, making me believe it's a function of the samba version rather than the config. So, I realize that's not the ideal bug report, but is it possible someone running 3.0.23c could check and see if they are seeing a similar issue? - Logan
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 15:57, Logan Shaw wrote:> ????????Group or user names: > ????????+-----------------------------------+ > ????????| (H) ?Logan Shaw (MYDOMAIN\lshaw) ?| > ????????| (HH) engineer (MYDOMAIN\engineer) | > ????????| (HH) Everyone ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | > ????????+-----------------------------------+FWIW, I get this: ????????Group or user names: ????????+-----------------------------------+ ????????| (HH) Everyone | ????????| (H) ?Logan Shaw (MYDOMAIN\lshaw) | ????????| (HH) engineer (MYDOMAIN\engineer) | ????????+-----------------------------------+ (with the 3.0.23b-3.0.23c rev.2 patchset) Chris
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 14:38, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:> I've uploaded the *final* 3.0.23c roll up patch to > http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/patch-3.0.23b-3.0.23c-gwc-2.diffs.gz. > I've already cut the 3.0.23c tarballs so unless there is > a major problem, this will be the final change set. > > Please report *any* bugs that you find. ?I'd like to wrap > this one up and do the public 3.0.23c release on Friday.Thanks. I've placed an ebuild for this at: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143903 in case any Gentoo users want to test it. Chris
Am Mittwoch, den 30.08.2006, 13:38 -0500 schrieb Gerald (Jerry) Carter:> I've uploaded the *final* 3.0.23c roll up patch to > http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/patch-3.0.23b-3.0.23c-gwc-2.diffs.gz. > I've already cut the 3.0.23c tarballs so unless there is > a major problem, this will be the final change set. > > Please report *any* bugs that you find. I'd like to wrap > this one up and do the public 3.0.23c release on Friday.Stuff applys and installs fine. But my group membership problem from thread "Authentication fails (sometimes)" still exists. The problem is I cannot always authenticate when I need admin rights. E.g. WinXP or Win2k Server Terminalservices (Admin-Mode), unlock a workstation locked by another user, ... However, it seems I always have full access to the system when i Logon on regular Machines where I don't need these permissions. Mario -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20060830/c06bc5fe/attachment.bin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mario Lipinski wrote:> Stuff applys and installs fine. > > But my group membership problem from thread "Authentication fails > (sometimes)" still exists. > > The problem is I cannot always authenticate when I need admin rights. > E.g. WinXP or Win2k Server Terminalservices (Admin-Mode), unlock a > workstation locked by another user, ... > However, it seems I always have full access to the system when i Logon > on regular Machines where I don't need these permissions.yeah...but if you are using the one of the sql passdb plugins, you'll have to talk to those guys. Or reproduce the error against tdbsam to prove its ours. Sorry. cheers, jerry ====================================================================Samba ------- http://www.samba.org Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com "What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE9fzQIR7qMdg1EfYRAjAtAKDGvidAvsaZb/q+bCJOUQEHjgV35ACgxfXW Dg8nI9q+C4o9aPyiw68/Ohw=PCXk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mario Lipinski wrote:> Am Mittwoch, den 30.08.2006, 16:02 -0500 schrieb Gerald (Jerry) Carter: >> yeah...but if you are using the one of the sql passdb >> plugins, you'll have to talk to those guys. Or reproduce >> the error against tdbsam to prove its ours. Sorry. > > thx for the reply. Was somehow expecting this. > I will try on the pdbsql lists then. > > Is there a tool to convert from one pdb-backend to another > so i can test with tdbsam?Sure. $ pdbedit -i <sql plugin> -e tdbsam jerry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE9gIoIR7qMdg1EfYRAriLAJwIacsKOlLmL73KBR3EZaqCGr0IWwCdGm1a B2V1qfmp70Apy+A6xwr4DVw=fwKR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Am Mittwoch, den 30.08.2006, 16:24 -0500 schrieb Gerald (Jerry) Carter:> > Is there a tool to convert from one pdb-backend to another > > so i can test with tdbsam? > > Sure. > > $ pdbedit -i <sql plugin> -e tdbsamthx again. I was able to reproduce the problem with tdbsam. Should I post a new debug log or is the one with sql sufficient? Mario -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20060830/4f66b190/attachment.bin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mario Lipinski wrote:> Am Mittwoch, den 30.08.2006, 16:24 -0500 schrieb Gerald (Jerry) Carter: >>> Is there a tool to convert from one pdb-backend to another >>> so i can test with tdbsam? >> Sure. >> >> $ pdbedit -i <sql plugin> -e tdbsam > > thx again. > I was able to reproduce the problem with tdbsam. > Should I post a new debug log or is the one with > sql sufficient?Please file a bug report at bugzilla.samba.org and attach the log file there (no inline logs please). cheers, jerry ====================================================================Samba ------- http://www.samba.org Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com "What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE9iCXIR7qMdg1EfYRAlLgAKCPC7qEFngNMNY46HTWCcqj4FGaogCg6Kz7 rkfWGKIAIIcyREEc45fPhqU=FdR+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mario Lipinski wrote:> Am Mittwoch, den 30.08.2006, 18:34 -0500 schrieb Gerald (Jerry) Carter: >> Please file a bug report at bugzilla.samba.org and >> attach the log file there (no inline logs please). > > I just followed up to my posting on the list containing a new complete > log. I will also file a bug. > > Thx for your patience.Mario, if you get a chance, would you also please try this patch just to make sure we have already fixed this. http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/patch-3.0.23b-3.0.23c-gwc-2.diffs.gz Thanks. cheers, jerry ====================================================================Samba ------- http://www.samba.org Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com "What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE9jprIR7qMdg1EfYRAo+uAKC9UjNufZUGX34TfceOG4VdnWIxuwCfdZOK WVh2z0l1eqZj0jPbSEIlbuI=4st7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Am Mittwoch, den 30.08.2006, 20:24 -0500 schrieb Gerald (Jerry) Carter:> if you get a chance, would you also please try this patch > just to make sure we have already fixed this. > > http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/patch-3.0.23b-3.0.23c-gwc-2.diffs.gzSince this was the Thread I were following up to was about the second relase of the patch I think I am already running this version. Or did something change since your email 30.8. 13:38:23 -0500? Mario -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20060831/426bca12/attachment.bin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mario Lipinski wrote:> Am Mittwoch, den 30.08.2006, 20:24 -0500 schrieb Gerald (Jerry) Carter: >> if you get a chance, would you also please try this patch >> just to make sure we have already fixed this. >> >> http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/patch-3.0.23b-3.0.23c-gwc-2.diffs.gz > > Since this was the Thread I were following up to was > about the second relase of the patch I think I am > already running this version. Or did something change > since your email 30.8. 13:38:23 -0500?Nope. Nothing changed. I just wanted to make sure since I remembered you posting the bug before the patch was posted. cheers, jerry ====================================================================Samba ------- http://www.samba.org Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com "What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE9s+dIR7qMdg1EfYRAjRRAKC19OI44ehp3MkA0Qij90+gA4w6wACfXoA3 C7OKDph6AJHvpVgfC8MhTOo=lXF/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Jerry, In the future, when doing these pre-release tests, would it make sense to adjust the Release tags in the RPM packaging sections to reflect an ordered but prerelease nature of the builds? For instance, the first patch set built "3.0.23c-1" rpms. The second patch set also builds "3.0.23c-1" rpms. These aren't seen as updates, and would have to be force-installed. I manually adjusted the Release tag in the SPEC file from "1" to "2", to build "3.0.23c-2" rpms, which will then update cleanly. When the release tarball comes out, you'll probably still have the RPM Release tags still at "1", and then I'll have to adjust the SPEC's Release: tag to "3". May I suggest adjusting the Release tags in the SPEC files upward for each successive patch/release? One could (I think) even adopt a strategy of using Release values of "0.1", "0.2", etc. for prerelease patches/tests/etc., and then jumping to "1" for the actual "release" versions. Cheers, -D At 01:38 PM 8/30/2006, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Folks, > >I've uploaded the *final* 3.0.23c roll up patch to >http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/patch-3.0.23b-3.0.23c-gwc-2.diffs.gz. >I've already cut the 3.0.23c tarballs so unless there is >a major problem, this will be the final change set. > >Please report *any* bugs that you find. I'd like to wrap >this one up and do the public 3.0.23c release on Friday. > > > >cheers, jerry >====================================================================>Samba ------- http://www.samba.org >Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com >"What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) >Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > >iD8DBQFE9dsfIR7qMdg1EfYRAha2AKCngC4YgJ9zLj0S8nTmU193lNWe1wCgmDK4 >gM8YRMtJ/KzdLzlUk2Pjcfk>=Ggf7 >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >-- >To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/sambaDon Meyer <dlmeyer@uiuc.edu> Network Manager, ACES Academic Computing Facility Technical System Manager, ACES TeleNet System UIUC College of ACES, Information Technology and Communication Services "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty or safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
>From: "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <jerry@samba.org> > > Folks, > > I've uploaded the *final* 3.0.23c roll up patch to > http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/patch-3.0.23b-3.0.23c-gwc-2.diffs.gz. > I've already cut the 3.0.23c tarballs so unless there is > a major problem, this will be the final change set. > > Please report *any* bugs that you find. I'd like to wrap > this one up and do the public 3.0.23c release on Friday. >Jerry, Downloaded the patch and installed it. Mandriva 2005LE. (I applied it to a fresh source of 3.0.23b because patch kept complaining when I tried to apply it over the gwc-1.diffs patched source) ./configure --prefix=/usr --infodir=/usr/share --mandir=/usr/share --with-configdir=/etc/samba --enable-cups --with-privatedir=/etc/samba --with-automount --with-smbmount make proto make make install /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb restart All went well.... For my simple non-domain; non-winbind setup using smbpasswd; all looks great! Samba works like it should and I can connect. My setup (from testparm): [global] workgroup = RB_LAW server string = Samba Server %v map to guest = Bad User log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast time server = Yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 printcap name = cups show add printer wizard = No os level = 60 preferred master = Yes dns proxy = No wins support = Yes hosts allow = 192.168.7., 192.168.8., 127., 66.76.63.120 The confirmation: [root@bonza source]# smbclient -U% -L localhost Domain=[RB_LAW] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.23c-gwc-2] Sharename Type Comment --------- ---- ------- office Disk Shared Office Files rankin Disk Rankin Law Firm PLLC allen Disk T Stefan Allen bertin Disk Darren Bertin guillory Disk David Guillory jointcases Disk Joint Client Files lawtools Disk Case Development - Summation forms Disk Shared Forms and Briefs computer Disk Computer Drivers and Software closed Disk Closed Case Files print$ Disk pdf-gen Printer PDF Generator (only valid users) IPC$ IPC IPC Service (Samba Server 3.0.23c-gwc-2) Domain=[RB_LAW] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.23c-gwc-2] Server Comment --------- ------- BACKUP This is the backup computer BONZA Samba Server 3.0.23c-gwc-2 CW-DESK cynthia desktop GUILLORY LISHA Lisha RANKIN-P35 P35-S629 Laptop RECEPTION Dell 2400 2.6 GHz SECRETARY Front Office TSA-LAPTOP stefan laptop Workgroup Master --------- ------- RB_LAW BONZA Thanks for all your and the team's hard work! Now if Lars will just build the 3.0.23c binaries for SuSE, well be in great shape. I still can't figure out how to get it to compile with all the options he has in the SuSE spec file..... Oh well........ -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. RANKIN LAW FIRM, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 (936) 715-9333 (936) 715-9339 fax www.rankinlawfirm.com --
Maybe Matching Threads
- Preliminary 3.0.23c patch for testing and review
- 3.0.20 -> 3.0.23 SID/group error?? Won't connect.
- Strange Usermapping problem with 3.0.23b
- Samba 3.0.25c Going Nuts on our Network???
- FW: HELP -- Problem with access list on samba 3.0.23b but not on 3.0.20c PDC