samba - Jun 2004 - which XP clients registry hacks are necessary now?

I've read alot of dated material about various registry hacks to make 
various patch levels of XP Clients work.

Is there a URL that keeps this up to date?  I know it seems with each 
release of Samba there are less hacks necessary on XP Clients but there 
doesn't seems to be a definitive list.  Also with each new XP patch, 
there is a potential of needing more hacks.

If there isn't a source for this information can someone give me their 
best guess?  Latest Samba (3.0.4) and latest XP upgrades (SP1 with all 
windows updates til now).

Thanks,
-Scott

> I've read alot of dated material about various registry hacks to make 
> various patch levels of XP Clients work.
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE

Even Windows 2003 will merrily join a domain controlled by a recent version of 
Samba.  I know, I can show you one.

It seems this issue of registry hacks is posted at least once a day - the 
answer is NONE, NONE, NONE, NONE, NONE, NONE, NONE, NONE, NONE, NONE, NONE, 
NONE.

Scott Serr schrieb:
> I've read alot of dated material about various registry hacks to make 
> various patch levels of XP Clients work.
> 
> Is there a URL that keeps this up to date?  I know it seems with each 
> release of Samba there are less hacks necessary on XP Clients but there 
> doesn't seems to be a definitive list.  Also with each new XP patch, 
> there is a potential of needing more hacks.
> 
> If there isn't a source for this information can someone give me their 
> best guess?  Latest Samba (3.0.4) and latest XP upgrades (SP1 with all 
> windows updates til now).
> 
> Thanks,
> -Scott
no need for reg hacks , if you use latest samba