Hi, I'd like to reduce the size of the samba binaries. smbd for instance is about 1.5 meg, which is way to much if you ask me. Is there a way to create smaller binaries, maybe by compiling differently? thanx, Dennis ==== __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion! http://greetings.yahoo.com
Dennis Vriezekolk wrote:> > Hi, > > I'd like to reduce the size of the samba binaries. smbd for instance is > about 1.5 meg, which is way to much if you ask me. Is there a way to > create smaller binaries, maybe by compiling differently?you could try if the makefile has a target 'install-strip' instead of 'install'. that would install binaries which are stripped of all the debug information. I just reduced a smbd on HP-UX from 2,6meg down to 2 meg by stripping it. btw, 1.5 meg for a CIFS server is too big for you? look at how much disk NT4 eats... ;) bye MH
--- Justin Rickert <justin@zserf.com> wrote:> If you really want to spend the time try compiling it with -O4 after > the > gcc or g++ this will optimize the code to level 4. This is shooting > from > the hip I haven't used this for a while you might want to check. You > will have to edit the Makefile or the build system usually > install.sh. > Ram is cheap buy more. > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-admin@lists.samba.org] > On Behalf Of Dennis Vriezekolk > Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:35 AM > To: SAMBA > Subject: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries > > Hi, > > I'd like to reduce the size of the samba binaries. smbd for instance > is > about 1.5 meg, which is way to much if you ask me. Is there a way to > create smaller binaries, maybe by compiling differently? > > thanx, > > Dennis > > ====>Thanx, I didn't know about any optimization options, I'll try it ==== __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion! http://greetings.yahoo.com
At 12:34 AM -0800 1/3/02, Dennis Vriezekolk wrote:>Hi, > >I'd like to reduce the size of the samba binaries. smbd for instance is >about 1.5 meg, which is way to much if you ask me. Is there a way to >create smaller binaries, maybe by compiling differently? > >thanx, > >DennisPut the following into a file called smbd.c: --- #include "stdio.h" main(void) { printf("Server could not start!\n"); return(1); } --- then type: "gcc -o smbd smbd.c" And hey presto, it's down to 6k. It might not do some of the stuff that the real samba does, but my fork of samba will satisfy your (somewhat baffling) concerns regarding the size of the binaries for the real samba. Kind regards, -- Alex Dawson CSU - Systems Administrator +-------------------+------------------------------------------------+ /Tel: (08) 9380 1587/ Electrical and Electronic Engineering/ /Fax: (08) 9380 1065/ University of Western Australia/ /alex@ee.uwa.edu.au / http://www.ee.uwa.edu.au/~alex/ +-------------------+------------------------------------------------+ The following line brought to you by the ESOS Act 2000, section 107: "CRICOS Provider Code: 00126G"
Dennis Vriezekolk wrote:> > Hi, > > I'd like to reduce the size of the samba binaries. smbd for instance is > about 1.5 meg, which is way to much if you ask me. Is there a way to > create smaller binaries, maybe by compiling differently?The only real trick in this area is to turn off debugging.
>>OK, it looks like this is a HEAD (Samba 3.0 alpha) only thing. You >>could add a similar thing to Samba 2.2 without much effort.At the risk of not sounding like a programmer 8) ... How ? I'm sure that not much effort *is* involved but do we just recreate the lines from the alpha ? I currently have 421 connections on my Samba box (well it is Friday afternoon - so most people have gone home) at 1.5Mb each that's a lot of memory. Cheers Jon Gerdes
Isn't most of that memory being shared between the various copies anyway? "top" on my samba system shows me that while smbd uses roughly 2280K of memory, about 1500K of that is shared. I take that to mean that while a single smbd would use 2280K, the memory cost of adding each additional new smbd process is only about 700K. Given that, I'm not sure if making the binary smaller on disk will actually reduce your memory usage all that much. One of the more knowledgable people can correct me if I'm wrong. -----Original Message----- From: Jon Gerdes [mailto:GERDESJ@whl.co.uk] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 7:42 AM To: dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: Re: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries>>OK, it looks like this is a HEAD (Samba 3.0 alpha) only thing. You >>could add a similar thing to Samba 2.2 without much effort.At the risk of not sounding like a programmer 8) ... How ? I'm sure that not much effort *is* involved but do we just recreate the lines from the alpha ? I currently have 421 connections on my Samba box (well it is Friday afternoon - so most people have gone home) at 1.5Mb each that's a lot of memory. Cheers Jon Gerdes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Imp: Correct me here if am wrong. Every smbd connection process takes memory, which includes, Resident, shared, private which means memory cost of adding another smbd is 2280K not 700k in this. shared mem is taken for every smbd process - Need experts input on this plz regarda Abdul -----Original Message----- From: David Brodbeck [mailto:DavidB@mail.interclean.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 8:06 AM To: 'Jon Gerdes'; dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: RE: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries Isn't most of that memory being shared between the various copies anyway? "top" on my samba system shows me that while smbd uses roughly 2280K of memory, about 1500K of that is shared. I take that to mean that while a single smbd would use 2280K, the memory cost of adding each additional new smbd process is only about 700K. Given that, I'm not sure if making the binary smaller on disk will actually reduce your memory usage all that much. One of the more knowledgable people can correct me if I'm wrong. -----Original Message----- From: Jon Gerdes [mailto:GERDESJ@whl.co.uk] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 7:42 AM To: dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: Re: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries>>OK, it looks like this is a HEAD (Samba 3.0 alpha) only thing. You >>could add a similar thing to Samba 2.2 without much effort.At the risk of not sounding like a programmer 8) ... How ? I'm sure that not much effort *is* involved but do we just recreate the lines from the alpha ? I currently have 421 connections on my Samba box (well it is Friday afternoon - so most people have gone home) at 1.5Mb each that's a lot of memory. Cheers Jon Gerdes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
I thought the stuff in the 'shared memory' column in top was shared between running processes, so didn't contribute to the total. That would mean only the resident memory that's not shared would be taken for each process. I could be wrong, though. -----Original Message----- From: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 [mailto:AJAVID1@motorola.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:21 PM To: 'David Brodbeck'; 'Jon Gerdes'; dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: RE: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries Imp: Correct me here if am wrong. Every smbd connection process takes memory, which includes, Resident, shared, private which means memory cost of adding another smbd is 2280K not 700k in this. shared mem is taken for every smbd process - Need experts input on this plz regarda Abdul -----Original Message----- From: David Brodbeck [mailto:DavidB@mail.interclean.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 8:06 AM To: 'Jon Gerdes'; dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: RE: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries Isn't most of that memory being shared between the various copies anyway? "top" on my samba system shows me that while smbd uses roughly 2280K of memory, about 1500K of that is shared. I take that to mean that while a single smbd would use 2280K, the memory cost of adding each additional new smbd process is only about 700K. Given that, I'm not sure if making the binary smaller on disk will actually reduce your memory usage all that much. One of the more knowledgable people can correct me if I'm wrong. -----Original Message----- From: Jon Gerdes [mailto:GERDESJ@whl.co.uk] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 7:42 AM To: dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: Re: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries>>OK, it looks like this is a HEAD (Samba 3.0 alpha) only thing. You >>could add a similar thing to Samba 2.2 without much effort.At the risk of not sounding like a programmer 8) ... How ? I'm sure that not much effort *is* involved but do we just recreate the lines from the alpha ? I currently have 421 connections on my Samba box (well it is Friday afternoon - so most people have gone home) at 1.5Mb each that's a lot of memory. Cheers Jon Gerdes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
I'm using Linux; top varies a lot from operating system to operating system. Mine has SIZE, RSS, and SHARE columns. -----Original Message----- From: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 [mailto:AJAVID1@motorola.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:32 PM To: 'David Brodbeck'; Javid Abdul-AJAVID1; 'Jon Gerdes'; dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: RE: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries which version of "top" are you using i dont see "shared memory" column in top i can see only SIZE, RES I was also using MemTool, it gives more description of the process any more inputs on this memory utilization, its imp we all understand this correctly. thanks -----Original Message----- From: David Brodbeck [mailto:DavidB@mail.interclean.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 11:27 AM To: 'Javid Abdul-AJAVID1'; David Brodbeck; 'Jon Gerdes'; dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: RE: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries I thought the stuff in the 'shared memory' column in top was shared between running processes, so didn't contribute to the total. That would mean only the resident memory that's not shared would be taken for each process. I could be wrong, though. -----Original Message----- From: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 [mailto:AJAVID1@motorola.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:21 PM To: 'David Brodbeck'; 'Jon Gerdes'; dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: RE: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries Imp: Correct me here if am wrong. Every smbd connection process takes memory, which includes, Resident, shared, private which means memory cost of adding another smbd is 2280K not 700k in this. shared mem is taken for every smbd process - Need experts input on this plz regarda Abdul -----Original Message----- From: David Brodbeck [mailto:DavidB@mail.interclean.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 8:06 AM To: 'Jon Gerdes'; dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: RE: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries Isn't most of that memory being shared between the various copies anyway? "top" on my samba system shows me that while smbd uses roughly 2280K of memory, about 1500K of that is shared. I take that to mean that while a single smbd would use 2280K, the memory cost of adding each additional new smbd process is only about 700K. Given that, I'm not sure if making the binary smaller on disk will actually reduce your memory usage all that much. One of the more knowledgable people can correct me if I'm wrong. -----Original Message----- From: Jon Gerdes [mailto:GERDESJ@whl.co.uk] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 7:42 AM To: dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: Re: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries>>OK, it looks like this is a HEAD (Samba 3.0 alpha) only thing. You >>could add a similar thing to Samba 2.2 without much effort.At the risk of not sounding like a programmer 8) ... How ? I'm sure that not much effort *is* involved but do we just recreate the lines from the alpha ? I currently have 421 connections on my Samba box (well it is Friday afternoon - so most people have gone home) at 1.5Mb each that's a lot of memory. Cheers Jon Gerdes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
which version of "top" are you using i dont see "shared memory" column in top i can see only SIZE, RES I was also using MemTool, it gives more description of the process any more inputs on this memory utilization, its imp we all understand this correctly. thanks -----Original Message----- From: David Brodbeck [mailto:DavidB@mail.interclean.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 11:27 AM To: 'Javid Abdul-AJAVID1'; David Brodbeck; 'Jon Gerdes'; dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: RE: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries I thought the stuff in the 'shared memory' column in top was shared between running processes, so didn't contribute to the total. That would mean only the resident memory that's not shared would be taken for each process. I could be wrong, though. -----Original Message----- From: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 [mailto:AJAVID1@motorola.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:21 PM To: 'David Brodbeck'; 'Jon Gerdes'; dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: RE: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries Imp: Correct me here if am wrong. Every smbd connection process takes memory, which includes, Resident, shared, private which means memory cost of adding another smbd is 2280K not 700k in this. shared mem is taken for every smbd process - Need experts input on this plz regarda Abdul -----Original Message----- From: David Brodbeck [mailto:DavidB@mail.interclean.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 8:06 AM To: 'Jon Gerdes'; dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: RE: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries Isn't most of that memory being shared between the various copies anyway? "top" on my samba system shows me that while smbd uses roughly 2280K of memory, about 1500K of that is shared. I take that to mean that while a single smbd would use 2280K, the memory cost of adding each additional new smbd process is only about 700K. Given that, I'm not sure if making the binary smaller on disk will actually reduce your memory usage all that much. One of the more knowledgable people can correct me if I'm wrong. -----Original Message----- From: Jon Gerdes [mailto:GERDESJ@whl.co.uk] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 7:42 AM To: dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: Re: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries>>OK, it looks like this is a HEAD (Samba 3.0 alpha) only thing. You >>could add a similar thing to Samba 2.2 without much effort.At the risk of not sounding like a programmer 8) ... How ? I'm sure that not much effort *is* involved but do we just recreate the lines from the alpha ? I currently have 421 connections on my Samba box (well it is Friday afternoon - so most people have gone home) at 1.5Mb each that's a lot of memory. Cheers Jon Gerdes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
true i was using solaris2.6 -----Original Message----- From: David Brodbeck [mailto:DavidB@mail.interclean.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 11:34 AM To: 'Javid Abdul-AJAVID1'; 'Jon Gerdes'; dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: RE: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries I'm using Linux; top varies a lot from operating system to operating system. Mine has SIZE, RSS, and SHARE columns. -----Original Message----- From: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 [mailto:AJAVID1@motorola.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:32 PM To: 'David Brodbeck'; Javid Abdul-AJAVID1; 'Jon Gerdes'; dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: RE: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries which version of "top" are you using i dont see "shared memory" column in top i can see only SIZE, RES I was also using MemTool, it gives more description of the process any more inputs on this memory utilization, its imp we all understand this correctly. thanks -----Original Message----- From: David Brodbeck [mailto:DavidB@mail.interclean.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 11:27 AM To: 'Javid Abdul-AJAVID1'; David Brodbeck; 'Jon Gerdes'; dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: RE: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries I thought the stuff in the 'shared memory' column in top was shared between running processes, so didn't contribute to the total. That would mean only the resident memory that's not shared would be taken for each process. I could be wrong, though. -----Original Message----- From: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 [mailto:AJAVID1@motorola.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:21 PM To: 'David Brodbeck'; 'Jon Gerdes'; dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: RE: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries Imp: Correct me here if am wrong. Every smbd connection process takes memory, which includes, Resident, shared, private which means memory cost of adding another smbd is 2280K not 700k in this. shared mem is taken for every smbd process - Need experts input on this plz regarda Abdul -----Original Message----- From: David Brodbeck [mailto:DavidB@mail.interclean.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 8:06 AM To: 'Jon Gerdes'; dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: RE: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries Isn't most of that memory being shared between the various copies anyway? "top" on my samba system shows me that while smbd uses roughly 2280K of memory, about 1500K of that is shared. I take that to mean that while a single smbd would use 2280K, the memory cost of adding each additional new smbd process is only about 700K. Given that, I'm not sure if making the binary smaller on disk will actually reduce your memory usage all that much. One of the more knowledgable people can correct me if I'm wrong. -----Original Message----- From: Jon Gerdes [mailto:GERDESJ@whl.co.uk] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 7:42 AM To: dennisvr@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: Re: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries>>OK, it looks like this is a HEAD (Samba 3.0 alpha) only thing. You >>could add a similar thing to Samba 2.2 without much effort.At the risk of not sounding like a programmer 8) ... How ? I'm sure that not much effort *is* involved but do we just recreate the lines from the alpha ? I currently have 421 connections on my Samba box (well it is Friday afternoon - so most people have gone home) at 1.5Mb each that's a lot of memory. Cheers Jon Gerdes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
can you plz explain, Kbytes, Resident , Shared and Private colums for whole
process - smbd.
this much of memory is taken up if you have another smbd process right?
thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: David Collier-Brown [mailto:davecb@canada.sun.com]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 10:03 AM
To: David Brodbeck
Cc: 'Jon Gerdes'; dennisvr@yahoo.com; samba@lists.samba.org;
abartlet@pcug.org.au
Subject: Re: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries
David Brodbeck wrote:>
> Isn't most of that memory being shared between the various copies
anyway?
> "top" on my samba system shows me that while smbd uses roughly
2280K of
> memory, about 1500K of that is shared.
on solaris, the address space look like this:
elsbeth> pmap -x `pgrep smbd`
517: /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd -D
Address Kbytes Resident Shared Private Permissions Mapped
File
00010000 1384 424 - 424 read/exec smbd
00178000 160 72 - 72 read/write/exec smbd
001A0000 288 264 - 264 read/write/exec [ heap ]
FF140000 8 8 - 8 read/write/shared dev:118,7
ino:1371973
FF150000 8 - - - read/write/shared dev:118,7
ino:1371975
FF160000 8 8 - 8 read/write/shared dev:118,7
ino:1309890
FF170000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
FF180000 672 648 624 24 read/exec libc.so.1
FF238000 32 32 - 32 read/write/exec libc.so.1
FF250000 16 16 8 8 read/exec libmp.so.2
FF264000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec libmp.so.2
FF270000 8 8 - 8 read/exec
libc_psr.so.1
FF280000 552 504 456 48 read/exec libnsl.so.1
FF31A000 32 32 - 32 read/write/exec libnsl.so.1
FF322000 32 24 - 24 read/write/exec libnsl.so.1
FF330000 40 40 32 8 read/exec
libsocket.so.1
FF34A000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec
libsocket.so.1
FF350000 24 24 16 8 read/exec libgen.so.1
FF366000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec libgen.so.1
FF370000 16 16 8 8 read/exec libsec.so.1
FF384000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec libsec.so.1
FF390000 8 8 - 8 read/exec libdl.so.1
FF3A0000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
FF3B0000 136 136 128 8 read/exec ld.so.1
FF3E2000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec ld.so.1
FFBEC000 16 16 - 16 read/write/exec [ stack ]
-------- ------ ------ ------ ------
Kbytes Resident Shared Private
total Kb 3496 2336 1272 1064
My smbd (without libraries) takes 1544 KB, but only
496 KB is unshared. The libraries add the rest
of the data
Kbytes Resident Shared Private
00010000 1384 424 - 424 read/exec smbd
00178000 160 72 - 72 read/write/exec smbd
--dave
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
Performance & Engineering | some people and astonish the rest.
Americas Customer Engineering, | -- Mark Twain
(905) 415-2849 | davecb@canada.sun.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
can you explain Kbytes, Resident, shared and Private for whole process - smbd if you have another smbd process than similar memory will be taken right? -----Original Message----- From: David Collier-Brown [mailto:davecb@canada.sun.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 10:03 AM To: David Brodbeck Cc: 'Jon Gerdes'; dennisvr@yahoo.com; samba@lists.samba.org; abartlet@pcug.org.au Subject: Re: [Samba] How to reduce size of samba binaries David Brodbeck wrote:> > Isn't most of that memory being shared between the various copies anyway? > "top" on my samba system shows me that while smbd uses roughly 2280K of > memory, about 1500K of that is shared.on solaris, the address space look like this: elsbeth> pmap -x `pgrep smbd` 517: /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd -D Address Kbytes Resident Shared Private Permissions Mapped File 00010000 1384 424 - 424 read/exec smbd 00178000 160 72 - 72 read/write/exec smbd 001A0000 288 264 - 264 read/write/exec [ heap ] FF140000 8 8 - 8 read/write/shared dev:118,7 ino:1371973 FF150000 8 - - - read/write/shared dev:118,7 ino:1371975 FF160000 8 8 - 8 read/write/shared dev:118,7 ino:1309890 FF170000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ] FF180000 672 648 624 24 read/exec libc.so.1 FF238000 32 32 - 32 read/write/exec libc.so.1 FF250000 16 16 8 8 read/exec libmp.so.2 FF264000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec libmp.so.2 FF270000 8 8 - 8 read/exec libc_psr.so.1 FF280000 552 504 456 48 read/exec libnsl.so.1 FF31A000 32 32 - 32 read/write/exec libnsl.so.1 FF322000 32 24 - 24 read/write/exec libnsl.so.1 FF330000 40 40 32 8 read/exec libsocket.so.1 FF34A000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec libsocket.so.1 FF350000 24 24 16 8 read/exec libgen.so.1 FF366000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec libgen.so.1 FF370000 16 16 8 8 read/exec libsec.so.1 FF384000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec libsec.so.1 FF390000 8 8 - 8 read/exec libdl.so.1 FF3A0000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ] FF3B0000 136 136 128 8 read/exec ld.so.1 FF3E2000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec ld.so.1 FFBEC000 16 16 - 16 read/write/exec [ stack ] -------- ------ ------ ------ ------ Kbytes Resident Shared Private total Kb 3496 2336 1272 1064 My smbd (without libraries) takes 1544 KB, but only 496 KB is unshared. The libraries add the rest of the data Kbytes Resident Shared Private 00010000 1384 424 - 424 read/exec smbd 00178000 160 72 - 72 read/write/exec smbd --dave -- David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify Performance & Engineering | some people and astonish the rest. Americas Customer Engineering, | -- Mark Twain (905) 415-2849 | davecb@canada.sun.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Good morning Samba gurus, I had one of my managers ask me an interesting question yesterday, and I did not have an answer for him. The question was, "is it possible for samba to authenticate a Unix logon between Sun, SGI, and Linux and control nfs shares?" I have never heard of using Samba this way. Is it even possible? Best regards Stan Boeing Math & Computing Technology