NOKUBI Takatsugu
2006-Jul-21 16:07 UTC
[Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#379092: xen-utils-3.0: xen-backend.rules placed incorrect directory
Package: xen-utils-3.0 Version: 3.0.2+hg9697-1 Severity: critical The xen-backend.rules file is stored in /dev/udev, but it is not correct. I made the symlink into /dev/udev/rules.d/ so it works. It is also mentioned at the following place: http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/396 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-386 Locale: LANG=ja_JP.eucJP, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.eucJP (charmap=EUC-JP)
Guido Trotter
2006-Jul-21 20:27 UTC
Bug#379092: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#379092: xen-utils-3.0: xen-backend.rules placed incorrect directory
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 05:44:03PM +0900, NOKUBI Takatsugu wrote: Hi,> Package: xen-utils-3.0 > Version: 3.0.2+hg9697-1 > Severity: critical > > The xen-backend.rules file is stored in /dev/udev, but it is not > correct. > I made the symlink into /dev/udev/rules.d/ so it works. > > It is also mentioned at the following place: > http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/396 >Shoudln't xen-utils' postint be creating the symlink? Why does it fail in your situation? If the symlink gets created why is putting the file in /etc/udev incorrect... An last but not least: why severity critical? ;) Guido
Bastian Blank
2006-Jul-22 00:47 UTC
Bug#379092: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#379092: xen-utils-3.0: xen-backend.rules placed incorrect directory
severity 379092 normal tags 379092 moreinfo thanks On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 05:44:03PM +0900, NOKUBI Takatsugu wrote:> The xen-backend.rules file is stored in /dev/udev, but it is not > correct.This is correct, check the udev policy.> I made the symlink into /dev/udev/rules.d/ so it works.This is done by the postinst. Bastian -- Time is fluid ... like a river with currents, eddies, backwash. -- Spock, "The City on the Edge of Forever", stardate 3134.0
Debian Bug Tracking System
2006-Jul-25 08:18 UTC
[Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#379092: marked as done (xen-utils-3.0: xen-backend.rules placed incorrect directory )
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:29:47 +0200 with message-id <20060725072947.GA4157@tie> and subject line [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#379092: xen-utils-3.0: xen-backend.rules placed incorrect directory has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: NOKUBI Takatsugu <knok@daionet.gr.jp> Subject: xen-utils-3.0: xen-backend.rules placed incorrect directory Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:44:03 +0900 Size: 1859 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20060725/636076f6/attachment.mht -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Guido Trotter <ultrotter@debian.org> Subject: Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#379092: xen-utils-3.0: xen-backend.rules placed incorrect directory Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:29:47 +0200 Size: 2611 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20060725/636076f6/attachment-0001.mht