Hendrik Jaeger
2010-Jul-28 12:05 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Bug#590679: [logcheck-database] rules for ntpd
Package: logcheck-database Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, some rules for ntpd as i couldn't find any: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: time reset [+-]*[0-9]{1,2}\.[0-9]{6} s$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: synchronisation lost$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: no servers reachable$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: synchronized to ([0-9.]{7,15}|[0-9a-fA-F:.]{4,39}), stratum [0-9]+$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: synchronized to LOCAL\([0-9]+\), stratum [0-9]+$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: kernel time sync (disabled|enabled) [0-9]+$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: kernel time sync (enabled|status( change)?) [0-9]+$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: precision [0-9]+\.[0-9]+ usec$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: peer ([.0-9]{7,15}|[0-9a-fA-F:.]{4,39}) now (in)?valid$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: adjusting local clock by -?[.0-9]+s$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: adjust time server -?[.0-9]+ offset$ Hendrik -- Hendrik Jaeger Linux Systemadministrator Init Seven AG Elias-Canetti-Strasse 7 CH-8050 Z?rich phone: +41 44 315 44 00 fax: +41 44 315 44 01 http://www.init7.net/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20100728/381e0df8/attachment.pgp>
Debian Bug Tracking System
2010-Aug-02 07:42 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Bug#590679: marked as done ([logcheck-database] rules for ntpd)
Your message dated Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:32:00 +0200 with message-id <4C567470.1070007 at vonhaugwitz.com> and subject line Re: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#590679: [logcheck-database] rules for ntpd has caused the Debian Bug report #590679, regarding [logcheck-database] rules for ntpd to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 590679: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590679 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Hendrik Jaeger <jaeger at init7.net> Subject: [logcheck-database] rules for ntpd Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:05:57 +0200 Size: 3401 URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20100802/c3ba3cc9/attachment.eml> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Hannes von Haugwitz <hannes at vonhaugwitz.com> Subject: Re: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#590679: [logcheck-database] rules for ntpd Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:32:00 +0200 Size: 1904 URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20100802/c3ba3cc9/attachment-0001.eml>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Bug#590684: [logcheck-database] rules for rsyslog
- Bug#590677: [logcheck-database] additional rules for nagios/radius
- Bug#552222: logcheck: dhclient regexes need updating
- Bug#590559: updated rules for webmin
- Bug#569014: logcheck kernel rules don't match [<blank><number>.<number>]