Carlos, Have looked at the diff's between the trunk and Testing, I found that it would probably be very worthwhile to backport the driver from the trunk. As far as I can see, the driver in the trunk will allow for better debugging, which would be a welcome addition. Could you take care of that? Best regards, Arjen
Carlos Rodrigues
2007-Sep-09 19:38 UTC
[Nut-upsdev] Backporting megatec driver into Testing
On 9/9/07, Arjen de Korte <nut+devel at de-korte.org> wrote:> Carlos, > > Have looked at the diff's between the trunk and Testing, I found that it > would probably be very worthwhile to backport the driver from the trunk. > As far as I can see, the driver in the trunk will allow for better > debugging, which would be a welcome addition. Could you take care of that?I also have some other pending stuff to add to megatec, but haven't got the time to do it. I'll try doing it sometime this week. -- Carlos Rodrigues
Reasonably Related Threads
- Fwd: Megatec - modem control lines [impact to megatec_usb]
- Megatec driver status [was: Re: UPS (Megatec) with strange voltage values]
- megatec and some changes to cmdvartab and new-names.txt
- Megatec - modem control lines
- UPS (Megatec) with strange voltage values