search for: backport

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4562 matches for "backport".

Did you mean: backports
2004 Jul 06
1
Debian woody backport of 0.99.10.6 now available on backports.org
Well, the backports.org people finally installed my backport of the latest stable version of dovecot. Please remove the Braincells apt source form /etc/apt/sources.list and add these lines instead. deb http://www.backports.org/debian stable dovecot openldap2 postgresql openssl deb-src http://www.backports.org/debia...
2016 Apr 26
2
apt pinning specific dovecot version
I currently have the dovecot-core package from wheezy-backports pinned on one of my servers to version '2.2.9', which has been working great. I now want to upgrade that to the newest version under wheezy-backports which is: dovecot-core (1:2.2.13-11~bpo70+1) but I can't figure out how to get do it. I've tried a few different formats of the nam...
2012 Apr 12
13
[ANNOUNCE] backports for 4.0.4 and 4.1.3 stable releases
The time has come for another round of stable releases. Please send (or resend) any outstanding backport requests for 4.0.4 and 4.1.3 before Friday 20 April. Note that 4.0.4 will likely be the last release in the 4.0.x branch. Ian.
2023 Apr 30
3
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
...t;> Hi Yvan, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I >>>>>> need to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then >>>>>> getting the newest Samba packages from Bookworm backports. It's >>>>>> just a little over a month away, so there is ample time for >>>>>> planning upgrades. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Peter >>>>>> >>>...
2023 Jul 13
2
[Freedreno] [PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
...e problems for everyone cherry-picking patches to a >>>> downstream kernel (LTS or distro tree). I usually wouldn't expect >>>> sympathy here, but the questionable benefit does not outweigh the cost >>>> IM[biased]O. >>> >>> I agree that for backports this isn't so nice. However with the split >>> approach (that was argumented against here) it's not soo bad. Patch #1 >>> (and similar changes for the other affected structures) could be >>> trivially backported and with that it doesn't matter if you write de...
2023 Jul 13
2
[Freedreno] [PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
...e problems for everyone cherry-picking patches to a >>>> downstream kernel (LTS or distro tree). I usually wouldn't expect >>>> sympathy here, but the questionable benefit does not outweigh the cost >>>> IM[biased]O. >>> >>> I agree that for backports this isn't so nice. However with the split >>> approach (that was argumented against here) it's not soo bad. Patch #1 >>> (and similar changes for the other affected structures) could be >>> trivially backported and with that it doesn't matter if you write de...
2023 Mar 13
1
Updating samba version 4.17.5 to version 4.17.6 from Debian backports - armel architecture
...problems. But one which is armel architecture failed to update; instead I get the following when I try to update: root at goflex:~# samba -V Version 4.17.5-Debian root at goflex:~# apt update Hit:1 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease Get:2 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports InRelease [49.0 kB] Get:3 http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba bullseye/samba-4.17/ InRelease [2325 B] Hit:4 https://pkg.ltec.ch/public bullseye InRelease Get:5 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports/main armel Packages.diff/Index [63.3 kB] Get:6 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian bull...
2012 Jul 13
11
Backport requests of cs 23420..23423 for 4.0 and 4.1
Hi, we are experiencing significant performance degradation after live migration of hvm domains in Xen 4.0 (SLES11 SP1): after live migration the performance is dropping to less than 90%. I did a backport of cs 23420-23423 and the performance is okay now. I would like to request to include these changesets in 4.0 and 4.1. The backport is quite trivial, I can send patches if you are willing to take them. Juergen -- Juergen Gross Principal Developer Operating Systems PDG ES&S...
2010 May 04
0
cifs-utils 4.1 in Debian lenny backports
(this mail is crossposted to 4 mailing lists, some of which being subscribers-only. Please consider this when answering if you need to) Let's see this as my first achievement of SambaXP (http://www.sambaxp.org). An "official" backport of cifs-utils (http://www.samba.org/linux-cifs/cifs-utils/) is now available for users of Debian lenny. This package can be found on backports.org, which is a service run by Debian developers to provide backported versions of software to the stable release of Debian. These backports often receive...
2014 Oct 22
4
4.1.11/DebianWheezyBackports vs. 4.1.12/Sernet
Hi all, I wonder if there are any pro/cons between using Samba4 of Debian's official Wheezy-backports repository which actually is version 4.1.11 -or- using Samba4 of Sernet's official repository which actually is on version 4.1.12 I understand that Sernet's package at that moment is more recent, but recently I had an issue which was Debian/Samba4 related and unfortunately I made the ex...
2023 Apr 30
1
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
...: >>>>> Hi Yvan, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I >>>>> need to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then >>>>> getting the newest Samba packages from Bookworm backports. It's >>>>> just a little over a month away, so there is ample time for >>>>> planning upgrades. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> Peter >>>>> >>>> >>>> There...
2023 Jul 13
1
[Freedreno] [PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
...ot accepted. This > > will cause problems for everyone cherry-picking patches to a > > downstream kernel (LTS or distro tree). I usually wouldn't expect > > sympathy here, but the questionable benefit does not outweigh the cost > > IM[biased]O. > > I agree that for backports this isn't so nice. However with the split > approach (that was argumented against here) it's not soo bad. Patch #1 > (and similar changes for the other affected structures) could be > trivially backported and with that it doesn't matter if you write dev or > drm (or whatev...
2023 Jul 13
1
[Freedreno] [PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
...ot accepted. This > > will cause problems for everyone cherry-picking patches to a > > downstream kernel (LTS or distro tree). I usually wouldn't expect > > sympathy here, but the questionable benefit does not outweigh the cost > > IM[biased]O. > > I agree that for backports this isn't so nice. However with the split > approach (that was argumented against here) it's not soo bad. Patch #1 > (and similar changes for the other affected structures) could be > trivially backported and with that it doesn't matter if you write dev or > drm (or whatev...
2023 Apr 30
1
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
...>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means >>>>>>> I need to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and >>>>>>> then getting the newest Samba packages from Bookworm backports. >>>>>>> It's just a little over a month away, so there is ample time for >>>>>>> planning upgrades. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Peter >>>&...
2009 Dec 15
2
Debian and Ubuntu packages of 1.0.17
I uploaded packages of 1.0.17 to Debian unstable more than a month ago, and also updated the xapian-backports PPA on launchpad: https://launchpad.net/~xapian-backports/+archive/ppa But more recently and more notably, I've now uploaded backported packages for Debian 5.0 (the current stable release, codename lenny) and Debian 4.0 (the "oldstable" release, codename etch) to backports.org: ht...
2017 Jul 14
2
questions about backport to 3.8/3.9/4.0
Thanks. That is good suggestion. I will start to work on 4.0 now. It would be good to know the 4.0.x patch release schedule and how to contribute. I found this email containing backporting timeline for 4.0.1 (already done): http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-March/111530.html >From email, it is not clear to me whether we have upcoming 4.0.2 or not. Thanks! Yonghong On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 2:27 PM, 陳韋任 <chenwj.cs97g at g2.nctu.edu.tw> wrote: > I have no e...
2013 Jul 12
16
preparing for 4.2.3 and 4.1.6
Aiming at a release some time in August, I''d like to cut RC1-s by Thursday next week (as I''ll be on a two week vacation starting Friday). Please indicate any bug fixes that so far may have been missed in the backports already done. A few fixes are currently stuck in master''s staging branch (or pending to make it there) - these don''t need to be named explicitly, I''m already planning to pull over the hypervisor ones as soon as they get out of staging. To my knowledge there hasn''...
2017 Jul 14
2
questions about backport to 3.8/3.9/4.0
Hi, I want to backport the following three patches (currently in trunk 5.0) to 3.8/3.9/4.0: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL305560 https://reviews.llvm.org/rL305608 https://reviews.llvm.org/rL306685 Some BPF users want them since their product needs to work on old linux distribution which has older versions of LLVM. Could...
2014 Jul 19
0
[HowTo] Installing Samba and sssd on Debian Wheezy (with manual backport)
Hi everyone, A couple of weeks ago I wanted to install Samba and sssd on a Debian Wheezy server. The Samba version from the wheezy-backports repo looks and feels fairly well packaged by now and is updated to the upstream version, so in my opinion that's the way to go. As regards sssd, I wanted a version supporting the AD backend (the one in the Wheezy repos doesn't), so I backported it manually from Jessie (or sid). The main ad...
2010 May 05
4
Samba 3.5.2 packages for Debian lenny
...(including me with my professionnal hat) want to use 3.5 versions of samba on production servers running Debian. Of course, most of the time, these production servers are running Debian lenny (the stable version of the distribution). Debian lenny ships with samba 3.2.5, so these users need a "backported" package....or to compile packages themselves. We already had backports of samba 3.4.7, which is the version currently shipped in Debian "testing" (aka "the next Debian version"). These are available through the http://backports.org service, also known as the "nearl...