similar to: Backporting megatec driver into Testing

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Backporting megatec driver into Testing"

2007 Jun 18
2
Fwd: Megatec - modem control lines [impact to megatec_usb]
Hi, Sorry for the forwarding. I sent this with the wrong "from" address and got rejected by the list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Carlos Rodrigues <cefrodrigues at mail.telepac.pt> Date: Jun 18, 2007 9:34 PM Subject: Re: Megatec - modem control lines [impact to megatec_usb] To: Arjen de Korte <nut+devel at de-korte.org> Cc: ups-dev-list <nut-upsdev at
2008 Oct 20
1
Megatec driver status [was: Re: UPS (Megatec) with strange voltage values]
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Arjen de Korte <nut+devel at de-korte.org> wrote: > Citeren Carlos Rodrigues <cefrodrigues at gmail.com>: > >> BTW, the patch has a small typo in one of the comments: "applied to >> battery.volage" :) > > I'll leave that up to you to correct. Since it is only a comment, it won't > be visible to innocent users
2006 Dec 04
4
megatec and some changes to cmdvartab and new-names.txt
I had some free time this weekend, and made some long overdue changes to "megatec". The thing is, these changes lead to a couple of questions that I must ask before I go on and "svn commit" them: 1) The blazer, fentonups, esupssmart, ippon, sms and mustek drivers are now completely covered and all of their functionality should now be present in megatec, and also every model
2007 Jun 18
1
Megatec - modem control lines
Carlos, Today I was browsing through the NUT Tracker and noticed an entry which linked to a message on nut-upsdev: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2006-January/000559.html Although the fentonups driver is no longer in the tree (since it was replaced by the megatec driver), I think there is still some merit in this patch. Notice the following lines from this message: >
2008 Oct 06
4
UPS (Megatec) with strange voltage values
Hello Nut List! I have 2 "Lacerda 10KVA" UPS that returns strange values for Q1 and F commands: Q1 (215.0 215.0 219.0 004 60.0 2.27 39.0 00000001 F #220.0 045 240.0 60.0 At least what I know about Megatec, It seems to say that it has a 240.0 V battery with currently 2.27V. Quite strange. I contacted Lacerda to help me interpret this values and they said that 2.27 is just 1 element
2007 Aug 13
2
[nut-commits] svn commit r1049 - in trunk: . drivers
Alexander Gordeev wrote: > Author: agordeev-guest > Date: Mon Aug 13 13:09:43 2007 > New Revision: 1049 > > Log: > drivers/megatec_usb.c: added credits to the banner message. Is this really needed/desirable? I think this kind of information needs to be put in the AUTHORS document. There are many more people on this list that put a lot of effort in NUT, without claiming credit
2007 May 03
4
Re: Changes to megatec.c
Hi, Charles, On Wed, 2 May 2007 07:58:08 -0400, you wrote: > > Will that be enough to make it useable as a contribution? I believe > > the more sensible values for 36V UPS'es will be useful to other models > > than the one I have, too. > > Sounds good, but I don't think I saw it hit the list yet... I now have the following in megatec.c: static BatteryVolts
2007 Oct 03
2
[nut-commits] svn commit r1136 - in trunk: . drivers
> Author: agordeev-guest > Date: Wed Oct 3 00:09:21 2007 > New Revision: 1136 > > Log: > - drivers/megatec_usb.c: added ability to do subdriver-specific > initialization, and moved some shared code to agiler init function > since krauler doesn't need it. [...] I'm not very thrilled about this patch: 1) Down at the subdriver level, one shouldn't use
2007 Mar 28
1
Re: Nut-upsuser Digest, Vol 21, Issue 29
THANKS, but the 'megatec' driver only works whith windows OS via USB, and i need it for red hat OS with USB-serial connection... Please, anybody can help me.... nut-upsuser-request@lists.alioth.debian.org escribi?: Send Nut-upsuser mailing list submissions to nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
2007 Jun 18
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r964 - in trunk: . drivers
Arjen de Korte wrote: > Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Mon Jun 18 09:03:18 2007 > New Revision: 964 > > Log: > additional debug info in case commands fail > > Modified: > trunk/ChangeLog > trunk/drivers/megatec.c > > Modified: trunk/ChangeLog Arnaud, Carlos, I'd like to backport this change to Testing as well. Intermittent startup problems for
2007 Nov 24
2
support for newer mustek powermust model 06da:0003
A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 188 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20071124/3ceb35d2/attachment.pgp
2008 Dec 05
2
Mustek PowerMust 848
Hi, I'm not the maintainter for the "megatec_usb" driver (in fact, I'm no longer maintainer for the base "megatec" either), so I don't really know the status for that particular UPS. I'm forwarding this to the NUT mailing-list though. Regards, -- Carlos Rodrigues On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Adrian Czerniak <adrian.czerniak at becomo.com> wrote:
2008 Dec 05
2
Mustek PowerMust 848
Hi, I'm not the maintainter for the "megatec_usb" driver (in fact, I'm no longer maintainer for the base "megatec" either), so I don't really know the status for that particular UPS. I'm forwarding this to the NUT mailing-list though. Regards, -- Carlos Rodrigues On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Adrian Czerniak <adrian.czerniak at becomo.com> wrote:
2007 Jun 21
2
[nut-commits] svn commit r971 - in trunk: . drivers
> Author: aquette > Date: Thu Jun 21 07:43:46 2007 > New Revision: 971 > > Log: > fix communication lost status handling > > Modified: > trunk/ChangeLog > trunk/drivers/usbhid-ups.c > > Modified: trunk/ChangeLog > ============================================================================== > --- trunk/ChangeLog (original) > +++ trunk/ChangeLog
2008 Jul 01
8
megatec process die
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20080701/3140c7d2/attachment.htm
2006 Dec 30
2
megatec over USB - using Andrey Lelikov's approach
Hi All, finally, I've got time and resources for development. Unfortunately I couldn't afford playing with my UPS because it was used permanently, but now it's ok. I've checked out cureent trunc and I see that Andrey Lelikov's changes haven't been applied yet. What's wrong with them? I think, he made a great job to simplify future support for this kind of
2008 Jul 03
3
megatec driver floods syslog with "UPS lost/re-established" messages
Hello, I have bought Powerman Optima 500 Plus UPS. While this product might be unknown outside Russia, it is shipped with megatec software and obviously works with megatec driver in NUT. besides the following problems (I think they are caused by one reason): 1) megatac driver is able to load and detect UPS only on second or third run. On the first run it typically fails. Later if daemon is
2007 Dec 29
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r1204 - in trunk: . drivers
Carlos Rodrigues wrote: > Author: carlosefr-guest > Date: Sat Dec 29 20:17:01 2007 > New Revision: 1204 > > Log: > - drivers/megatec.c: detect OB status while OFF. You've changed a bit more than this line suggests. [...] > @@ -565,10 +575,16 @@ > dstate_setinfo("input.voltage.fault", "%.1f", query.fvolt); >
2009 Dec 28
4
Megatec driver floods logs #2 & mail notifications
Hi there! I'm a n00b NUT user trying to get it running on RHEL5 and actually do something useful for me. Few questions: 1) I want it to notify me by email on power loss and power back events. I can't find any sample scripts for this purpose... Where shall I look for them? 2) So far, I've backported the package from Fedora and got my Ablerex running (previously used with Upsilon /
2007 Aug 19
4
OMRON BX35F
Hi nut-upsdev, I have just got OMRON BX35F. Only object files and usage information is included. Where should I start to help you to get it supported? Any interest in supporting it at all?