rspec users - May 2007 - rspec mocha and controller specs without integrated_views

The ability to choose a mocking framework is great as I prefer mocha, but I 
am have problems.

On my controller specs, I am forced to ''integrate_views'' as
the following
code below shows you, the mocking of views is rspec specific. See stub! 
versus mocha''s stub

          unless block_given?
            unless integrate_views?
              @template.stub!(:file_exists?).and_return(true)
              
@template.should_receive(:render_template).any_number_of_times.and_return(true) 
{ |*args|
                @first_render ||= args[2]
              }
              
@template.stub!(:find_template_extension_for).and_return("rhtml")
              @template.stub!(:read_template_file).and_return("this is fake
content generated by rspec")
            end
          end

I am getting the following error: undefined method `stub!''
Any plans on fixing this?

Matt

On 5/23/07, Matt Deiters <mdeiters at msn.com>
wrote:
> The ability to choose a mocking framework is great as I prefer mocha, but I
> am have problems.
>
> On my controller specs, I am forced to ''integrate_views''
as the following
> code below shows you, the mocking of views is rspec specific. See stub!
> versus mocha''s stub
>
>           unless block_given?
>             unless integrate_views?
>               @template.stub!(:file_exists?).and_return(true)
>
>
@template.should_receive(:render_template).any_number_of_times.and_return(true)
> { |*args|
>                 @first_render ||= args[2]
>               }
>
> @template.stub!(:find_template_extension_for).and_return("rhtml")
>               @template.stub!(:read_template_file).and_return("this is
fake
> content generated by rspec")
>             end
>           end
>
> I am getting the following error: undefined method `stub!''
> Any plans on fixing this?
Sure. Go ahead and raise an RFE in the tracker
(http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?group_id=797). If you want to see it
happen fast, submit a patch. Now that users can use any mock
framework, we should probably not use any mock framework for anything
internal, so the method should just override the methods that are
being mocked.
>
> Matt
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>

On 5/24/07, Matt Deiters <mdeiters at msn.com>
wrote:
> The ability to choose a mocking framework is great as I prefer mocha, but I
> am have problems.
>
> On my controller specs, I am forced to ''integrate_views''
as the following
> code below shows you, the mocking of views is rspec specific. See stub!
> versus mocha''s stub
>
>           unless block_given?
>             unless integrate_views?
>               @template.stub!(:file_exists?).and_return(true)
>
>
@template.should_receive(:render_template).any_number_of_times.and_return(true)
> { |*args|
>                 @first_render ||= args[2]
>               }
>
> @template.stub!(:find_template_extension_for).and_return("rhtml")
>               @template.stub!(:read_template_file).and_return("this is
fake
> content generated by rspec")
>             end
>           end
>
> I am getting the following error: undefined method `stub!''
> Any plans on fixing this?
>
We didn''t know about it before you told us.
If you want it fixed fast, send a patch, if not, wait for us to do it.
In any case, a ticket with a failing spec would be great.

Aslak
> Matt
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>