asterisk users - Dec 2007 - Subject: Newb Question

Hi,

Use orecx, voip call recording and monitoring.

www.orecx.com


Thanks & Regards,
Vidura Senadeera,
Sri Lanka.
Tel - +94114520001
Mobile - +94777766596
yahoo/skype Ids - vidurased
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:58:41 +0530
> From: ram <talk2ram at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Newb Question
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
>        <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Message-ID:
>        <b74751490711291928n692877c3w84c9d03f49b00bf8 at
mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> chan spy does the job i belive
>
> ram
>
> On Nov 30, 2007 7:37 AM, Jeff Adams <maillists0 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I inherited an office with phones that are hosted off-site. Everything
> is
> > skinny and G729. I see that the FreeBSD asterisk port comes with a
G729
> > codec.
> > I want to record everything. If I use port mirroring on my switch, is
it
> > possible to configure asterisk to record and assemble packets that it
> > doesn't otherwise route? Is it insane to user asterisk for this
purpose?
> > Advice or a link to a howto would be greatly appreciated.
> >
>
> --
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20071203/e6951d47/attachment.htm

Hi,

 

I have a SIP provider who sometimes sends duplicate RTP packets to me.

 

Sent RTP packet to      10.55.20.201:17440 (type 08, seq 008536, ts
4846560, len 000160)

Got  RTP packet from    10.55.20.201:17440 (type 08, seq 051978, ts
3647104992, len 000160)

Got  RTP packet from    10.55.20.201:17440 (type 08, seq 051979, ts
3647104992, len 000160)

 

Sent RTP packet to      10.55.20.201:17440 (type 08, seq 008537, ts
4846720, len 000160)

Got  RTP packet from    10.55.20.201:17440 (type 08, seq 051980, ts
3647105152, len 000160)

Got  RTP packet from    10.55.20.201:17440 (type 08, seq 051981, ts
3647105152, len 000160)

 

 

Unfortunately they're unable to filter it because this is the way they
receive it themselves.

 

Can this be fixed within asterisk with a custom patch? <hint>

 

Kind regards

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20071205/c710d272/attachment.htm