asterisk users - Feb 2006 - RE: 5, 000 concurrent calls system rollout question

Isn't it ridiculous that Hammer charges an arm and a leg for any work they
do. For systems as large as that one, we just setup a seperate one, connect them
back to back and run automated script to burn it in.

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of William
Boehlke
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 2:21 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: 5,000 concurrent calls system rollout
question


How we actually achieve the throughput is our intellectual property but we
have a number of customers who are scaling towards and past that traffic
level.  One of these days we hope to be able to justify the very large fee
Hammer wants to extract from us to produce a third party verification.

One single machine cant do 5000 IP -> PSTN translations.


u can use some asterisk as frontend to do codec translation, from   
any codec to g711,
and deliver all calls to Asterisk with the Sangoma board in G711,  
Sangoma has a T3/E3 board

this exaple will reduce the load on the servers with pstn card.

If u want asterisk only to route 5000 calls, without rtp media, u  
dont need any of this .


Rafael Marconi
rmmarconi@hotmail.com
rmmarconi@gmail.com



Em 02/02/2006, ?s 18:00, Wai Wu escreveu:
> Isn't it ridiculous that Hammer charges an arm and a leg for any  
> work they do. For systems as large as that one, we just setup a  
> seperate one, connect them back to back and run automated script to  
> burn it in.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of William
> Boehlke
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 2:21 PM
> To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: 5,000 concurrent calls system  
> rollout
> question
>
>
> How we actually achieve the throughput is our intellectual property  
> but we
> have a number of customers who are scaling towards and past that  
> traffic
> level.  One of these days we hope to be able to justify the very  
> large fee
> Hammer wants to extract from us to produce a third party verification.
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users