asterisk users - Jan 2005 - ANNOUNCEMENT : NEW CallingCardApplication fo rAsterisk

Excuse me, Replication?
You mean having 4Gb of Ram only for replication, do you know the mysql
replication is all on memory?, i can find better uses of it.
i prefer linux-ha and postgres, it a beauty, at least for me, and you know,
if it works for you....
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Karl J.
Vesterling
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 2:46 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] ANNOUNCEMENT : NEW CallingCardApplication
forAsterisk



You and me both Brian...
I've found MySQL to be fast, reliable, and once you have the replication set
up, talk about reliable!!!

I haven't used Postgress since 1998, and ummmmm...  I'm not going
back...

There's an old phrase of wisdom that describes his opinion...  "The
farmer
won't eat what he doesn't know."

You'll notice the same irrational reaction coming from Windoze DeeVelopers
when asked to use an Oracle Database running on a Unix system.  All of a
sudden you hear comments about how it's not going to be
"compatible" etc...
A good indicator of a conditioned response programmer is a comment like,
"Why don't we just use Microsoft Access." or (oooh this one just
gives me
the willies) "why not use ODBC for connectivity to the database?"

Either way, this philosophical discussion regarding which is better belongs
on a list involving discussion about SQL servers, and not about FINE VOIP
applications such as this wonderful asterisk open source PBX we have all
come to know and love.



At 03:08 PM 1/26/2005, you wrote:

> It is better to stay with Postgres. If you don't want to loose your
> business stay away from MySQL.
> If you are from Toronto ( I suppose you are ), you can check my posts to
> TLUG (Toronto Linux User Group)
> regarding MySQL and Postgres. I would say Postgres is a Open Source
> Oracle. It's very stable, very scalable
> and it's perfectly works under serious workload. MySQL is dying at the
> same configuration.
> I have client of mine who having issue with MySQL. Under some workload (
> 10 users inserting at the same time )
> it corrupts the index. Even MySQL 4.0.X is still corrupts the indexes
> under heavy load.
> I never saw it with Postgres. At the same time Postgres provides you a
> very flexible SQL language and features,
> as well as you can make stored procedures on Perl and many-many more.
RIIIGHT it sounds like someone doesn't know what they are doing.  I have
NEVER EVER had anything bad happen to mysql under heavy load.  

bkw

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
<http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users> 
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
<http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users>  

Best Regards, 
Karl J. Vesterling
E-Mail: kjv@ken-ton.com
Yahoo Messenger: karl_vesterling
ICQ: 1548052
AOL Instant Messenger: n2vqm


  _____  

Telephone:
Washington DC: (202) 448-3009 Extension 0
Annapolis MD: (240) 524-6706 Extension 0
Seattle WA: (360) 516-1822 Extension 0
Niagara Falls NY: (716) 286-9175 Extension 0
Buffalo NY: (716) 608-1121 Extension 0
United Kingdom: 0870 3403428 Extension 0 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050126/71424711/attachment.htm