search for: riiight

Hey, I''m designing an app which displays the events near a user in RoR. I''m using the beat forum to facilitate user management/sessions/etc. I''ve edited the sessions table in the Beast database to contain a "session_location" value and what I''d like to do is to set this to the users location when they log in. This would allow them to change their

...e ) > it corrupts the index. Even MySQL 4.0.X is still corrupts the indexes > under heavy load. > I never saw it with Postgres. At the same time Postgres provides you a > very flexible SQL language and features, > as well as you can make stored procedures on Perl and many-many more. RIIIGHT it sounds like someone doesn't know what they are doing. I have NEVER EVER had anything bad happen to mysql under heavy load. bkw _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-us...

...t even with all that work, you'll still have the possibility of > surprising results: > > def f(m): > mp = ModuleProvider.new(m) > # do something useful? > > m = Module.new("") > f(m) > print(m.name) # Segfault, heap corruption, etc. Riiight. Let's try again: 1) The MP dtor does a no-op (deletes self, but not the module it owns) 2) The module has a 'provider' attribute, initially None. 3) When a MP is created for a module, it sets module.provider to itself. 4) MP itself has a reference to the module it owns. Essentiall...

...the index. Even MySQL 4.0.X is still corrupts the indexes >> under heavy load. >> I never saw it with Postgres. At the same time Postgres provides you a >> very flexible SQL language and features, >> as well as you can make stored procedures on Perl and many-many more. > RIIIGHT it sounds like someone doesn't know what they are doing. I have > NEVER EVER had anything bad happen to mysql under heavy load. I think you don't know what is HEAVY load!! or had put a mysql under that. And also, mysql lacks lots of very useful features (in v5, the list is a bit shor...

Hi Here is something that worked with with 2.6.10-1.771_FC2smp and stopped working when I upgraded to 2.6.16-1.2069_FC4smp. These are fedora kernels and the network controller is an Intel Gbit (e1000) running a 100 Mbps Full Duplex. Don''t know how or if this matters but the 2.6.10 kernel has CONFIG_X86_HZ=1000 and the 2.6.16 has CONFIG_HZ=250 The idea is to just shape to , say 2Mbit, a

On May 12, 2008, at 02:58, Mahadevan R wrote: >> Consider the case where a function creates and populates a Module, >> stuffs it in an ExistingModuleProvider for the JIT, then returns >> the ModuleProvider, dropping direct reference to the Module. >> (ModuleProvider takes ownership of the Module.) I presume that your >> Python object is under the impression

> Consider the case where a function creates and populates a Module, stuffs it > in an ExistingModuleProvider for the JIT, then returns the ModuleProvider, > dropping direct reference to the Module. (ModuleProvider takes ownership of > the Module.) I presume that your Python object is under the impression it > owns the Module; when that goes out of scope, its refcount goes to zero

Guys, Just for fun, I tried to see (I know, a silly way to test it) how much overhead we have calling the C functions of the extensions. the benchmark script and the results: http://pastie.caboo.se/128646 The naive C extension: http://pastie.caboo.se/128647 I compared 1.8.6 (VC6 and mingw builds) against a fresh checkout of ruby trunk. What I understand from that is 1.9 is slower than 1.8