Hi, I've been loosing my mind with NAT and read that IAX doesn't have problems about nat. Does anyone knows about hadware (routers and etc) support IAX? Best regards helder -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20041230/f689bdde/attachment.htm
--Original Message Text--- From: Helder Rog?rio [MICROREDE] Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 15:32:59 -0000 Hi, I've been loosing my mind with NAT and read that IAX doesn't have problems about nat. Does anyone knows about hadware (routers and etc) support IAX? Best regards helder That's the thing about IAX....routers don't need to support it...it's design deals with NAT implicitly. You simply port forward 4569 to your * server and you're set. I use four separate ITSPs yet I only have one port forwarded to my * server. Further, when I'm away I simply use Firefly as an IAX soft phone. It connects back in the same manner. IAX is great! Michael -- Michael Graves mgraves@pixelpower.com Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com Pixel Power Inc. mgraves@mstvp.com o713-861-4005 o800-905-6412 c713-201-1262 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20041230/6e019480/attachment.htm
> Hi, > > I've been loosing my mind with NAT and read that IAX doesn't have problems about nat. > > Does anyone knows about hadware (routers and etc) support IAX? > > Best regards > helderWell, in fact, IAX doesn't needs an ALG (application level gateway) unlike SIP, IRC or FTP. It uses a one normal socket, so there is no more thinks to worry about, except maybe you will want HW that honors QoS prioritization (or better DiffServ) to make things run smoother. Miguel Ruiz Velasco __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250