search for: hadwar

Hi group, i'm brand new and i would like to ask about soekris hardware. I read along the web but i have some doubts that i think can be solved here. My question are the following: 1) does the Digium TDM400P fit in the soekris box with a 4801 SBC or a bigger box is needed? Any suggestions about where to pick up another box? 2) does the Digium TDM100P (already discontinued) fits fine in a

Hi, I've been loosing my mind with NAT and read that IAX doesn't have problems about nat. Does anyone knows about hadware (routers and etc) support IAX? Best regards helder -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20041230/f689bdde/attachment.htm

Hi: Is there any software or hadware for codec conversion on asterisk ,any suggestion will be appreciated. ? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100202/ee00a520/attachment.htm

...we have generated llvm? That is, an optimization is transforming > a function that would return an i8 into one that returns i16 or i32? > > Do you have a testcase for the problem you are trying to solve? > I think the problem was that some target don't support i32 natively (in hadware) like for exemple the PIC16. To force an extension to i32 is expensive on these target and may pose ABI compatibility problems. Anyways, i32 on 64 bits targets may be inefficient, so solving the problem in a more general way is better. Impossing i32 as *the* default size used by everyone is wr...

On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 11:55 +1300, Garming Sam via samba wrote: > Hi, > > Maybe this page might be helpful. I don't know how up to date it is, but > the expectation seems to be that it should be able to work with > alternative forms of authentication (with Kerberos PKINIT). > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_Smart_Card_Login Yeah, I think something that

Hi Andrew, Hi Sam, Many thanks for your quick replies, we already worked on this doc page but due to the lack of smart card reader/writer, we did not finished the setup. We'll buy some hadware and create a testing S4 lab to finish this config. What about biometry ? Is there a way to store any biometrical information into the ldap backend ? Is there by any chance any other third-party authentication method/tool that we can plug on S4 ? We would be pleased to avoid using another smart...

So I'm all excited, ready to install Trixbox at home. Purchased my X100p card installed in a computer. I run Trixbox setup and boom I get this error message "FXO PCI Master abort" It repaets across the screen and I have to reboot. When I reboot the system hangs at adding hardware. Loading wcfxo and the system will not go any further. If anyone has an idea of something to try let me

Hi, 1. I am NOT asking when it will be out. It will be when it's ready, very soon. 2. Is there a good tutorial on how to use Xen with Windows? I have googled and have not found some nice clear such as step 1,2,3... and why use this configuration. -- Thanks http://www.911networks.com When the network has to work

On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 5:22 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: > See above. Also, the base CentOS 7 3.10.0 kernel is becoming a bit > dated: it's 5 years old now. If you have time: can you set up a > smaller instance, do kernel updates on top of a CentOs 7 AMI, and see > if *that* AMI is compatible with the new instances? Might make for an > interesting

...s, an optimization is transforming > > a function that would return an i8 into one that returns i16 or i32? > > > > Do you have a testcase for the problem you are trying to solve? > > > > I think the problem was that some target don't support i32 natively (in > hadware) like for exemple the PIC16. To force an extension to i32 is > expensive on these target and may pose ABI compatibility problems. > > Anyways, i32 on 64 bits targets may be inefficient, so solving the > problem in a more general way is better. Impossing i32 as *the* default > size...

2009/3/13 <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com>: > Some targets want to do the promotion in the callee and some in the > caller. Now what you are discussing in your bug is we shouldn't do in > both... exactly. > Now the tricky part is that many targets (not for the sake of promotion, > but for the sake of performance) return a smaller value in a larger > register (say

Is there a way to disable the keyboard and mouse ports? I have a machine in a public area running an application that no-one needs to touch. However, someone could come up and plug a keyboard in it and mouse and be logged in as that user (not root). Is there a way to disable the mouse and keyboard so only remote ssh connections will control the PC if changes need to be made. This would also

Hi all, A while ago I posted about needing to access samba shares on the same machine that the samba server was running on. Someone posted a script to mount the shares and all was well till I upgraded my PC hadware and had a small accident :( I have tried modifing /etc/init.d/samba adding ... mount -t smbfs //127.0.0.1/common /mnt/samba/common -o credentials=/home/dave/.smbpw,uid=dave,gid=dave,fmask=660,dmask=770 > /dev/null mount -t smbfs //127.0.0.1/windows /mnt/samba/w...

...ld also be nice to keep pine using the existing maildir patch, even though very few IMAP-users would use pine. - Would dovecot scale, architecturally speaking, to 500k+ active mailboxes ? The amount of hardware is not really an issue, we can add a lot of machines (off-the-shelve intel hadware) to each cluster, but if each dovecot process has to load in an index of all possible mailboxes... that would be a problem. Doing an inordinate number of file-accesses over NFS would also be a problem, but I haven't seen any indication of that in the source, yet. In case it wasn...

...ruction routines takes 6 ms As you know, the ReconRefFrames routine is the caller of the IDCT, Reconstruction and LoopFilter. The ReconRefFrames wastes 31 ms from the total 44 ms. This is more than 66% of the decoding time. If I run the libtheora without the software IDCT , and using the IDCT hadware module, I get 46 ms of decoding time per frame. You can say that this makes no sense: Why with the help of a hardware module the time can increase ? The increase of time can be explained by two factors: 1) The overhead of data transfer on the bus is too expensive, this bus is shared with normal...

Some targets want to do the promotion in the callee and some in the caller. Now what you are discussing in your bug is we shouldn't do in both... Now the tricky part is that many targets (not for the sake of promotion, but for the sake of performance) return a smaller value in a larger register (say if the function is to return char, they return it in 32 bit register); So they are effectively