Christian, Just a quick heads up warning that something seems to be amiss on the Snom 200 running v2.03h code. The Message Waiting Indicator is blinking (due to a voicemail left in Asterisk) as its suppose to. Some time later the LED stops blinking (as though no voicemail); then later it starts blinking again. I left a voicemail to x3008 (button 2) this morning at 8:48am, and purposefully have not picked it up. I'm waiting on recurrance right now. I'm also running a sniffer packet trace to validate whether the phone is being told to turn off the LED, or whether something in the phone is doing it by itself. Pure guess: since there are two lines now defined on this phone, I'd bet Asterisk turns the LED on for MWI on x3008, and since no voicemail exists on x3002 (button 1), it turns it off. (Or something like that.) I don't seem to have this issue with the Cisco 7960's on the same asterisk box, so I'm jumping to the conclusion that something is amiss on the Snom 200 code. But we both know what "assume" means. Rich
Christian, The packet trace indicates that when a Snom 200 is configured with two extns, asterisk sends a Notify (with mwi=yes/no) every eight minutes. The MWI on the panel displays the "last" notify received. In my case, the notify for x3002 is received before the notify for x3008, and in later cases over time its the other way around (x3008 notify is received before x3002). Looks like the code in the phone needs to track notify's by extn number, and if any are mwi=yes, keep the LED on. "Last-In" control of the LED is not correct logic for multi-line phones. Rich ------------------------> Christian, > > Just a quick heads up warning that something seems to be amiss on > the Snom 200 running v2.03h code. > > The Message Waiting Indicator is blinking (due to a voicemail left > in Asterisk) as its suppose to. Some time later the LED stops > blinking (as though no voicemail); then later it starts blinking > again. > > I left a voicemail to x3008 (button 2) this morning at 8:48am, and > purposefully have not picked it up. I'm waiting on recurrance right > now. I'm also running a sniffer packet trace to validate whether > the phone is being told to turn off the LED, or whether something > in the phone is doing it by itself. > > Pure guess: since there are two lines now defined on this phone, I'd > bet Asterisk turns the LED on for MWI on x3008, and since no voicemail > exists on x3002 (button 1), it turns it off. (Or something like that.) > > I don't seem to have this issue with the Cisco 7960's on the same > asterisk box, so I'm jumping to the conclusion that something is > amiss on the Snom 200 code. But we both know what "assume" means. > > Rich >---------------End of Original Message-----------------
> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:25 PM > To: Asterisk-a-users-list; Christian Stredicke > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Heads up v2.03h on snom 200 > > Christian, > > Just a quick heads up warning that something seems to be amiss on > the Snom 200 running v2.03h code. > > The Message Waiting Indicator is blinking (due to a voicemail left > in Asterisk) as its suppose to. Some time later the LED stops > blinking (as though no voicemail); then later it starts blinking > again. > > I left a voicemail to x3008 (button 2) this morning at 8:48am, and > purposefully have not picked it up. I'm waiting on recurrance right > now. I'm also running a sniffer packet trace to validate whether > the phone is being told to turn off the LED, or whether something > in the phone is doing it by itself. > > Pure guess: since there are two lines now defined on this phone, I'd > bet Asterisk turns the LED on for MWI on x3008, and since no voicemail > exists on x3002 (button 1), it turns it off. (Or something like that.) > > I don't seem to have this issue with the Cisco 7960's on the same > asterisk box, so I'm jumping to the conclusion that something is > amiss on the Snom 200 code. But we both know what "assume" means. > > Rich > >Beta 2.03h for the snom 200 has already been removed from the web site. 2.03i is available but I'd suggest that Asterisk users stick with 2.03f for now. There are known issues with inbound line assignment on 2.03h and 2.03i. Richard